SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,782
- Reaction score
- 181,519
I cannot for the life of me see any possible advantage to killing them all.
She had nothing to gain.
She is independently wealthy.
I can't really see any advantage moneywise either. Though I am not sure of the laws in Victoria about assets from her mum's will ... if Simon might have a half claim on them or not. If they are not yet divorced, or are going through a divorce now, it is possible that there has been no property settlement yet.
As far as any other motive, we just don't know enough. But there may (or may not) be another motive.
It is possible she bought a random punnet of mushrooms that had been singularly tampered with, by an employee or a malevolent customer/supplier. And her in-law family were the unfortunate recipients.
That may be hard to disprove. Unless there is a strong (and as yet unknown by us) motive, along with the fact that she didn't get critically ill casting suspicion.
The other possibility I can think of, given the circumstances that we do know, is that she could have somehow been set up. That may be hard to disprove as well. Again, other than the fact that she didn't get critically ill.
Those are a couple of things that may cause reasonable doubt of guilt. imo