Innerchild
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2017
- Messages
- 957
- Reaction score
- 249
My apologies for making this complicated, and Im not trying to blind you with science. But you couldnt get anything more scientific and measurable than Newtons Laws of Motion. They describe the relationship between an object and the forces acting on it. It is not a theory. What is valuable in this calculating the second law, F = m x a, is that it gives a measurable force that is directly related to damage caused to the car. The only variable is the speed that it could be driven into the ocean. When applying the same force calculations to controlled crashes you can establish the force that was needed to cause the damage that occurred to JCs Fiat. I lived in Forrest St Cott, just up from the beach and joined Cott surf club when I first arrived in Perth in the early 80s. Even though I moved from my share house after two years, I stayed a Cott SLSC member for 8 to 10 years and then joined a surf club closer to home. I knew the beach, ocean, boatshed, boat ramp, groyne and reefs at Cott extremely well. I didnt even realise there was a mid beach reef for the first three years as it was usually totally covered by sand in those days. I was still a member when the car was found in the ocean, but wasnt at the club until a few months later and when talking with members it didnt mean much to me at the time when they were discussing a lot of damage and too much damage to the car as I hadnt seen the car. No one believed it could have been driven off groyne, but it seemed to be possibly the only way to explain damage. It wasnt until I saw an image of the retrieved car on this site that I realised there really was too much damage. I also realised that with a basic knowledge of biomechanics you could calculate the forces that would have applied to the car in the different scenarios people had for the car entering the ocean. I was able to find controlled crashes on video clips and was able to use these as a control to compare the forces that needed to be applied to cause the damage that occurred. I think it is really important to establish the facts as correctly as possible before making theories, and to my knowledge no one has done this before. You would have to apply the equivalent of a force around 100 ton for around 30 sec to get the damage that occurred to the car. The damage to the car could not have occurred by having been driven into the ocean in any of the ways suggested, IMO. And if you can get your head around that, then why go to all the trouble they must have to get it into the ocean. I think JC's appearance was well planned abduction that needed an extrodanary effort to dispose of the car, and con-incidently was spared close inspection by a woman calling police and a murder investigation only 5 days after they found the car. If you could find out how and who crushed to the car to dispose of it IMO you will be getting very close to the seriously evil person or people that were at the centre of this.
Maybe you could talk to some panel beaters or crash investigators for help with your calculations. Theory is never the same as real life, there are too many variables. Also maybe surf lifesavers that work at the Cottesloe club could help you with information about ocean conditions and what effect they may have on a car.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk