GUILTY Australia - Stephanie Scott, 26, Leeton, NSW, 5 April 2015 - #3

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
I didn't know her rings were melted down.

Never to be retrieved. I'm spewing and sickened to my core.

As Trooper said what's the bloody use! Really, what bloody hope have we got!!

Is there a link please?
 
How we don't have full on vigilante justice is beyond me when the courts are this out of step with community expectations.
 
How we don't have full on vigilante justice is beyond me when the courts are this out of step with community expectations.

The community of Leeton were all so kind to this family and now this?

Leeton must be reeling tonight.
 
The community of Leeton were all so kind to this family and now this?

Leeton must be reeling tonight.


who helps a community deal with this sort of stuff?... god knows, there wouldn't be too many mental health workers in Leeton, there must be a queue klms long , winding all the way back to Griffith for requests for help... .... ... who can afford private psyche help in Leeton... not many, and not for long....
 
How we don't have full on vigilante justice is beyond me when the courts are this out of step with community expectations.

Ozazure, some vigilante justice may have already begun:

http://www.dailyadvertiser.com.au/st...script/?cs=148
"There is evidence before me of him having been assaulted on 3 November 2015 when he was being held in Parklea Correctional Centre. Medical records indicate he attended the clinic that day complaining of having been punched once to the face. The nurse noted reddening and tenderness to the left orbital area which was tender on palpation but with minimal swelling... There is also evidence that the offender has been held in a form of protective custody because of the high profile nature of the case".
 
http://www.irrigator.com.au/story/4118862/stephanie-scotts-family-shattered-video/?cs=1524

Marcus Stanford sentencing brings no closure for family of Leeton murder victim Stephanie Scott
by Ken Grimson, 24 Aug 2016.

AN AIR of anger and frustration cast a pall over Leeton as news spread the man who callously sold rings taken from the fingers of murdered high school school teacher Stephanie Scott would be walking the streets again in less than three weeks...
 
I think he'll go back to the Netherlands

If he chooses to stay in Australia his life will be hell on earth so he'd be wise to go back to the Netherlands or crawl under a rock somewhere! Despicable excuse for a human being!
 
FYI
http://www.9news.com.au/national/2016/08/24/09/28/stephanie-scott-killer-twin-sentenced

NSW Premier Mike Baird slams Marcus Stanford's sentence over Stephanie Scott murder
by 9news, 7:34pm August 24, 2016.

NSW Premier Mike Baird has slammed the sentence handed down to the man who admitted he helped cover up the murder of teacher Stephanie Scott ... The premier said sentences must reflect community expectations... "The most horrendous crime deserves the most appropriate punishment," Mr Baird said in a press conference today.
"On the evidence I've seen, it doesn't seem appropriate. The Attorney-General is considering every possible avenue available to her"...
 
I didn't know her rings were melted down.

Never to be retrieved. I'm spewing and sickened to my core.

As Trooper said what's the bloody use! Really, what bloody hope have we got!!

Is there a link please?

Here is that link for you TGY:

http://www.theherald.com.au/story/4117218/marcus-stanford-sentenced-photos-video/?cs=2452

"Acting Justice Hulme noted the rings had been “scrapped” after being sold by Stanford to a jewellery store"...

http://www.news.com.au/national/ste...g/news-story/d60f0ce37d2b332d485aa659b0572fb5

"The murdered teacher’s diamond engagement ring and a graduation ring
were pawned for $705 and melted down, the Supreme Court has been told"... :(
 
who helps a community deal with this sort of stuff?... god knows, there wouldn't be too many mental health workers in Leeton, there must be a queue klms long , winding all the way back to Griffith for requests for help... .... ... who can afford private psyche help in Leeton... not many, and not for long....

What about the children let alone the teachers who attend the very rooms this horrific crime took place. It's all so horrible.

This is the worst of crimes. I've followed the callous murder of children, the murder of full families, but this has actually rocked my very soul.
Innocence lost. A bride preparing to walk down the isle.
Parents, a fiancé but the whole community of Leeton lost its innocence the day that scheming parasite needlessly took Stephanie's life.

I truly hate those two. I absolutely loath the blackness they represent.
 
http://tenplay.com.au/news/national/2016/8/24/horrendous-crime

There is a good summary of today's case on Horrendous Crime at above link.

Horrendous crime
Air Date:Wed 24 Aug 2016 Expires:in 1 month
In just over two weeks, Marcus Stanford will walk free from prison despite helping his brother cover up Stephanie Scott’s murder.

He must stay in prison.
Heartwrenching can't describe how I'm feeling right now at 1am.
I pray for Stephanie's family and loved ones. What they are feeling can't be expressed. My sorrow for them is immense.
I'm incredibly sad tonight. These brothers are the worst of the worst, the lowest of the low of how far a humans can sink.
All from one womb.
 
The NSW Attorney General is looking to appeal the 15-month sentence handed to Marcus Stanford for his role in school teacher Stephanie Scott's murder.
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/video/watch/32435652/nsw-ag-may-appeal-stanford-sentence/


How the judge believed those actions warranted just a small fraction of the maximum penalty is another mystery of the judiciary.
Indeed, it makes a mockery of the justice system.
If that system is a reflection of community standards and expectations, then the sentence is a manifest failure.
It is now incumbent on the Department of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to appeal the sentence and help restore a modicum of faith in the courts.

In October, Vincent Stanford will be sentenced for the murder of Ms Scott.

http://www.dailyadvertiser.com.au/story/4118605/justice-denied-in-stanford-sentencing-farce/?cs=150
 
The NSW Attorney General is looking to appeal the 15-month sentence handed to Marcus Stanford for his role in school teacher Stephanie Scott's murder.
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/video/watch/32435652/nsw-ag-may-appeal-stanford-sentence/

How the judge believed those actions warranted just a small fraction of the maximum penalty is another mystery of the judiciary.
Indeed, it makes a mockery of the justice system.
If that system is a reflection of community standards and expectations, then the sentence is a manifest failure.
It is now incumbent on the Department of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to appeal the sentence and help restore a modicum of faith in the courts.

In October, Vincent Stanford will be sentenced for the murder of Ms Scott.

http://www.dailyadvertiser.com.au/story/4118605/justice-denied-in-stanford-sentencing-farce/?cs=150

I'm uncomfortable with the Judge's appearance i.e.like a man who'd been drinking the night before and couldn't be bothered shaving!
As a member of our Judiciary, he should present as shaven and prepared IMHO. What's it coming to when our Judges present as dishevelled? :facepalm:
 
FYI
NSW Supreme Court ‏@NSWSupCt 37m37 minutes ago
SC sentences Marcus Stanford to 1yr 3m for being accessory after the fact to his brother’s murder of Stephanie Scott:http://bit.ly/2bhzuz4

Judgment Summary Supreme Court New South Wales
R v Stanford, Marcus [2016] NSWSC 1174
R A Hulme J

Excerpts:

R A Hulme J imposed a sentence of imprisonment for 1 year 3 months. The sentence was backdated to the date of the offender’s arrest on 10 June 2015. He received the benefit of a 25% reduction in sentence for the utilitarian value of his early plea of guilty.

A need arose to exclude Marcus as the principal offender given that he is the twin brother of Vincent....
On 5 August Marcus contacted police and disclosed that he had failed to tell the authorities in the course of their investigations, even after being specifically asked, that he had received two of Ms Scott’s rings and her driver’s licence by mail from Vincent. He sold the jewellery on 9 May and burnt the drivers licence around that time...

The acts of the offender which constitute the offence were his receipt of the two rings and driver’s licence; his failure to reveal this to police when asked; and his subsequent disposal of the rings by selling them and destruction of the driver’s licence.
The Crown conceded that these acts are fairly limited in comparison with other offences of this type... they had little if any impact upon the investigation as they occurred after the arrest of the principal offender.
In the light of all of the circumstances, the offence was assessed as falling towards the lower end of the range of objective seriousness.The Crown accepted that assessment...

This summary has been prepared for general information only. It is not intended to be a substitute for the judgment of the Court or to be used in any later consideration of the Court’s judgment.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
62
Guests online
1,329
Total visitors
1,391

Forum statistics

Threads
605,790
Messages
18,192,254
Members
233,543
Latest member
Dutah82!!
Back
Top