SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,989
- Reaction score
- 183,445
“ On Monday Craddock said he expected the evidence would establish William “was taken”.
What evidence can they have to prove William was taken, unless there is an eyewitness, or something obtained from illegal recordings.
That's a really interesting question, kiwi. I wonder if the recordings can be used in a coronial inquiry. While it is a court, things operate somewhat differently within the coronial courtroom. The main intent is to get to the bottom of what happened to the subject of the inquest.
We know that Jubes had been actively working with the coroner for some time, keeping her across the investigation.
Can Evidence That is Recorded Illegally be Used in Court?
This is a complex area of law as it largely depends on who wants the recording as evidence in court, how it was illegally obtained, for what purposes the recording is being admitted as evidence in court and its importance to the case.
Can Evidence That is Recorded Illegally be Used in Court?