Bio Mom & her family

[samsmom02]

Well if Misty is found to be responsible for Haleigh's disappearance or whatever has happened to Haleigh she will be tried as an adult not a child of 17. I see it as she can't be both. She has to be just one or the other. If she is an adult when it comes to being prosecuted for a crime then she should be an adult when it comes to dating. JMO

Great point!

 

[LaLaw2000]

To me the Bio Mom and family are still suspects. Who is to say they didn't have Haleigh taken, in a stunt to get custody back. Crystal is already in trouble for not paying child support.

Just one of the many possibilities...

I do not believe either side at all. Neither of them. BUT, I think the way GR played to Crystal and her family this past weekend that her wrongdoing's should be as 'out there' as Ronald's.

I will never look at Crystal's mother the same after reading her rap sheet. Or her dad either. Seems there are some real problems on both sides with breaking the law.

And yes, Crystal was already in trouble for not paying child support, and she knew it. I could easily see this family having little Haleigh taken. Wonder when or if Crystal and her family will be asked to take a polygraph? They say they would take one, but would they really?

This has gone on long enough. What about Haleigh? Where is she and does Crystal's family hold any answers?

 

[3dogmom]

What kind of info was on the grandparents rap sheets?

 

[mydailyopinions]

I do not believe either side at all. Neither of them. BUT, I think the way GR played to Crystal and her family this past weekend that her wrongdoing's should be as 'out there' as Ronald's.

I will never look at Crystal's mother the same after reading her rap sheet. Or her dad either. Seems there are some real problems on both sides with breaking the law.

And yes, Crystal was already in trouble for not paying child support, and she knew it. I could easily see this family having little Haleigh taken. Wonder when or if Crystal and her family will be asked to take a polygraph? They say they would take one, but would they really?

This has gone on long enough. What about Haleigh? Where is she and does Crystal's family hold any answers?

I agree! Sounds like a job for Kathy Belich!

 

[SeriouslySearching]

Well if Misty is found to be responsible for Haleigh's disappearance or whatever has happened to Haleigh she will be tried as an adult not a child of 17. I see it as she can't be both. She has to be just one or the other. If she is an adult when it comes to being prosecuted for a crime then she should be an adult when it comes to dating. JMO

:clap::clap::clap::clap:

 

[LaLaw2000]

Well if Misty is found to be responsible for Haleigh's disappearance or whatever has happened to Haleigh she will be tried as an adult not a child of 17. I see it as she can't be both. She has to be just one or the other. If she is an adult when it comes to being prosecuted for a crime then she should be an adult when it comes to dating. JMO

That's right. Misty has no more juvenile protection. No matter which way you slice it, she has admitted to being the person who last saw Haleigh and Ronald JR.. For that period of time, Misty was the caretaker.

I am sure it depends on the wording of the law, but Misty was only 16 when she and Ronald got together. IMO, NOW she can be prosecuted as an adult. She would not have been when she was 16.

 

[SeriouslySearching]

What kind of info was on the grandparents rap sheets?

UCN: 541997CF001301XXAXMX
File Date: 1997-07-28 Judge: WILLIAM A PARSONS
Defense Atty: CLARK, RONALD E

Defendant
SHEFFIELD, NANCY MARIE
Alias

Date # Docket Description
1997-07-28 1 ARREST REPORT - POSSESSION OF CANNABIS, POSSESSION WITN
1997-07-28 1 INTENT TO SELL OR DELIVER, MAINTAINING A DRUG DWELLING,
1997-07-28 1 POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA
1997-07-28 1 BOND SET AT $3,016.
1997-07-28 2 AFFIDAVIT OF INSOLVENCY
1997-07-28 3 APPEARANCE BOND - (UNSECURED)
1997-07-28 4 DEFENDANT'S NOTIFICATION OF BOND CONDITIONS
1997-08-11 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE BY RONALD E. CLARK & PLEA
1997-08-11 6 DEMAND FOR DISCOVERY
1997-09-29 7 INFORMATION (UNLAWFUL POSS. W/INTENT TO SELL OR
1997-09-29 7 DELIVER A CONT. SUBSTANCE, MAINTAINING A DRUG DWELLING)
1997-10-01 8 ORDER SETTING PRE-TRIAL 11/25/97
1997-10-01 9 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT 11/25/97
1997-10-01 10 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY 11/25/97
1997-10-06 11 STATE'S NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK JUDGEMENT FOR COSTS OF
1997-10-06 11 INVESTIGATON AND PROSECUTION
1997-10-06 12 ANSWER TO NOTICE OF DISCOVERY, DEMAND FOR NOTICE OF
1997-10-06 12 INTENTION TO CLAIM ALIBI WITNESS LIST
1997-11-25 13 PRE-TRIAL MINUTES: DEFT PRESENT, ATTENDED BY COUNSEL,
1997-11-25 13 RONALD CLARK. CASE SET FOR PLEA DAY 12/11/97
1997-11-25 14 NOTICE GIVEN TO DEFT. 12/11/97
1997-11-25 15 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT 12/11/97
1997-11-25 16 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY 12/11/97
1997-12-11 17 PLEA MIN: DEFT PRESENT, ATT BY, RONNIE CLARK.
1997-12-11 17 W/D FORMER PLEA, PLEAD GUILTY A/C CT I AND II UNLAWFUL POSS
1997-12-11 17 W/INTENT TO SELL OR DELIVER A CONT. SUB, MAINTAINING A
1997-12-11 17 DRUG DWELLING, ADVISED OF MAX PENALTY 5YRS AND OR $5000 FINE
1997-12-11 17 1YR AND OR $1000 FINE, PL ACCEPTED, PSI ORDERED, CASE
1997-12-11 17 SET FOR SENTENCING 1/27/98 STATE RECOMM. GUIDELINE SENTENCE
1997-12-11 17 IF NO PRIOR CONVICTIONS AND RECMM W/HOLD ADJ. STATE NOT
1997-12-11 17 TO FILE ADDITIONAL CHARGES.
1997-12-15 18 NOTICE TO DEFENDANT 01/27/98
1997-12-15 19 NOTICE TO ATTORNEY 01/27/98
1998-01-27 20 SCORESHEET FILED
1998-01-27 21 SENTENCING MINUTES: DEFT PRESENT, ATT BY RONALD CLARK.
1998-01-27 21 COURT WITHHELD ADJ. OF GUILT, ORDERED TO PAY $255 COURT COST
1998-01-27 21 AS TO CT. I SENTENCED TO 3YRS PROBATION, AS TO CT. II 1YRS
1998-01-27 21 PROBATION, RUN CONCURRENT WITH CT. I. TO PAY $25 COST OF
1998-01-27 21 SUPERVISION, TO COMPLETE OUT-IN PATIENT SUBSTANCE ABUSE
1998-01-27 21 COUNSELING AND TREATMENT IF NECESSARY AND PAY FOR ANY FEES
1998-01-27 21 OCCURED. TO PERFORM 50HRS. COMMUNITY SERVICE.
1998-01-27 22 ORDER WITHHOLDING ADJUDICATION OF GUILT AND PLACING
1998-01-27 22 DEFENDANT ON PROBATION - ENT MIN CIR CT BK276 PG662-665
1999-08-02 23 $22.69 PAYMENT MADE TO CASE
1999-08-06 24 $62.50 PAYMENT MADE TO CASE
1999-08-17 25 $37.19 PAYMENT MADE TO CASE
1999-08-23 26 $52.62 PAYMENT MADE TO CASE
2000-03-13 27 ORDER OF MODIFICATION OF PROBATION
2000-03-13 27 ENT MIN CIR CT - BK. 319 PG. 73-74
2003-03-28 28 LETTER FROM DEFENDANT/REQUEST FOR COPIES/NO MONIES SENT
2003-04-09 29 LETTER FROM DEFENDANT/$7.00/REQUEST FOR COPIES OF J & S
2003-04-09 29 MAILED 04-15-2003

 

[SeriouslySearching]

Here's Crystal's Daddy's

UCN: 542004CF001425XXAXMX
File Date: 2004-08-03 Judge: EDWARD E HEDSTROM
Defense Atty: STEPHENSON, JOHN W

Defendant
SHEFFIELD, JOHNNY MARCUS
Alias

Date # Docket Description
2004-08-03 1 COMPLAINT FILED: PCSO
2004-08-03 1 KNOWINGLY OWN, MANAGE OPERATE FACILITY TO FIGHT ANIMALS
2004-08-03 1 CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
2004-08-03 1 ATTENDING THE FIGHTING OR BATING OF ANIMALS
2004-08-03 1 ATTENDING THE FIGHTING OR BATING OF ANIMALS
2004-08-31 2 INFORMATION (CT 1-ANIMAL FIGHTING)
2004-09-14 3 CAPIAS ISSUED - BOND SET AT $1004.00
2004-10-14 4 ARREST REPORT - CT 1-ANIMAL FIGHTING -
2004-10-14 4 BOND SET AT $1004.00
2004-10-14 5 $1004.00 A-1 BAIL BONDS II - #2004-AA-77111
2004-10-14 6 DEFENDANT'S NOTIFICATION OF BOND CONDITIONS
2004-10-14 7 NOTICE TO BONDSMAN (11-10-2004)
2004-10-18 8 CAPIAS RETURNED EXECUTED
2004-11-10 9 ARR MIN: DEFT PRES, ADJ INS P D APPT (BILL BOOKHAMMER)
2004-11-10 9 ARR ENT PLEA OF NOT GUILTY - PRE TRIAL SET 12/14/2004
2004-11-10 10 AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENT STATUS
2004-11-10 11 ORDER APPOINTING PUBLIC DEFENDER
2004-11-10 12 ORDER FOR PRE TRIAL CONFERENCE
2004-11-16 13 NOTICE TO BONDSMAN (12-14-2004)
2004-12-14 14 PRE TRIAL MINUTES: DEFT PRES, ATT BY JOHN STEPHENSON
2004-12-14 14 ON MOTION OF DEFENSE COUNSEL, COURT ORDERED CASE
2004-12-14 14 CONTINUED TO 01/18/2005 AT 1:30 PM
2004-12-17 15 NOTICE TO BONDSMAN (01-18-2005)
2005-01-18 16 PRE TRIAL MINUTES: DEFT PRES, ATT BY JOHN STEPHENSON
2005-01-18 16 ON MOTION OF DEFENSE COUNSEL, COURT ORDERED CASE
2005-01-18 16 SET FOR PLEA DAY 01/20/2005
2005-01-20 17 PRE TRIAL MINUTES: DEFT PRES, ATT BY JOHN STEPHENSON
2005-01-20 17 W/D FORMER PLEA, PLEAD NOLO TO THE LESSER CRUELTY TO
2005-01-20 17 ANIMALS
2005-01-20 17 ADVISED OF MAX PENALTY 1 YR PCJ &/OR $1000 FINE
2005-01-20 17 PLEA ACCEPTED, PSI WAIVED, SENTENCING - DEFENDANT
2005-01-20 17 ADJUDGED GUILTY, ORDERED TO PAY $241.50 COURT COST, $250
2005-01-20 17 COST OF PROSECUTION AND $40 PUBLIC DEFENDER APP FEE,
2005-01-20 17 COSTS ENTERED AS A CIVIL LIEN, SENTENCED TO 1 DAY PCJ
2005-01-20 17 WITH 1 DAY CREDIT
2005-02-03 18 JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE - ENT MIN CIR CT BK PG
2005-02-04 19 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AS TO JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE
2005-02-22 20 CHARGES, COSTS, AND FEES ASSOCIATED WITH SENTENCE
2005-02-22 20 RECORDED OR BK 1017 PG 753
2005-09-23 21 NOTICE OF HEARING RETURNED UNEXECUTED
2005-09-23 21 DEFT NOT IN JAIL
2005-09-23 22 DEFENSE WITNESS SUBPOENA ISSUED:
2005-09-23 22 EVIDENCE CUSTODIAN
2005-09-26 23 DEFENSE WITNESS SUBPOENA RETURNED SERVED:
2005-09-26 23 EVIDENCE CUSTODIAN
2005-09-29 24 MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY
2005-09-30 25 MOTION HEARING MINUTES: DEFT PRES - COURT HEARD
2005-09-30 25 DEFENSE MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY - GRANTED -
2005-09-30 25 SONY CAMCORDER SERIAL #1528521 RET'D TO DEFT

 

[jaimie43]

Well if Misty is found to be responsible for Haleigh's disappearance or whatever has happened to Haleigh she will be tried as an adult not a child of 17. I see it as she can't be both. She has to be just one or the other. If she is an adult when it comes to being prosecuted for a crime then she should be an adult when it comes to dating. JMO

I think I can kind of see it as two seperate issues..

If Misty is responsible for H'C's dissapearance she should be held accountable.


Ron should be held accountable as an adult dating a minor (she was 16 after all). Misty wont be in trouble for this, just Ron. There are lots of instances where an adult was prosecuted for dating a minor even tho the minor objected and said they consented. Doesnt really matter tho-its a crime.

 

[3dogmom]

Thanks SS

So Grandma ran a Drug house, and Grandpa ran a dog fighting ring.

What a wonderful bunch.

 

[Kat]

I'm trying to find a link and I just can't locate it. Darn.

There was another statement made by Maternal Gma that made me have a knee jerk reaction as well when I heard it. (again, it was something simular that had been said in another case).

I'm trying to remember the exact words, so please don't take this as completely accurate.

Maternal Gma says that she thinks Haleigh may be in another state, and she names two states I think.

So I looked at that (the first comment I posted about was what gave a knee jerk). Then the reference to Haleigh being in alive but in another state.

Then another comment came to mind:

Maternal Gma says that she thinks that whoever has Haleigh is taking care of her. That Haleigh is fed and well.

Now none of these remarks alone would usually raise an eyebrow. But looked at together I get a knee jerk reaction about a possible family abduction.

Of course, that's just one of the many opinions/theories I have and am looking at, just my two cents.

 

[SeriouslySearching]

Also there was a cocaine charge on Chad, Bio mom's step-brother/fiance/baby daddy.

 

[RoseRed]

I think I can kind of see it as two seperate issues..

If Misty is responsible for H'C's dissapearance she should be held accountable.


Ron should be held accountable as an adult dating a minor (she was 16 after all). Misty wont be in trouble for this, just Ron. There are lots of instances where an adult was prosecuted for dating a minor even tho the minor objected and said they consented. Doesnt really matter tho-its a crime.

Maybe it shouldn't be.

 

[RoseRed]

Also there was a cocaine charge on Chad, Bio mom's step-brother/fiance/baby daddy.

His drug charges were also dropped or not prosecuted.

 

[SeriouslySearching]

I believe Chad paid a $100 fine and they were not dropped.

 

[TxLady2]

Even TN said LE wasn't telling them anything,but being RC had the custody and him and Crystal were never married,ofcourse it would be him LE went to first.BTW,I am not defending RC or taking his side,by any means,do not care for him,but Crystal's Mom's motivation in destroying any unity the family had in raising JR,bringing him through this,has greatly disturbed me.This is about Haleigh and that weekend stunt was to draw attention and sympathy to Crystal,this is not about her or the custody,I am sickened by this.

Ron and Crystal never being married has nothing to do with it. Haleigh lived with her father, but whatever information LE has, they should share with Crystal, she IS Haleigh's mother. As for the two sides being at odds, that might be natural, but they should come together and work towards finding the little girl. Being combative with each other is not going to help.
I don't believe Marie has any ulterior motive other than finding Haliegh, and I don't believe she staged this interview with Geraldo, it was all his idea, IMO. But I really don't think we should be pointing fingers at any of them at this point, since we don't know what it's all about.
However.... I tend to believe Crystal has every right to know what is going on, and if it can be confirmed that Ron was abusive to either one of those kids, then she has a right to bring it out in the open. And if it can be confirmed that Misty was negligent in any way, then BOTH of them can be held accountable for that. He left her with the responsibility of two kids that were not hers, and she is too immature to handle it.

 

[RR0004]

Ron and Crystal never being married has nothing to do with it. Haleigh lived with her father, but whatever information LE has, they should share with Crystal, she IS Haleigh's mother. As for the two sides being at odds, that might be natural, but they should come together and work towards finding the little girl. Being combative with each other is not going to help.
I don't believe Marie has any ulterior motive other than finding Haliegh, and I don't believe she staged this interview with Geraldo, it was all his idea, IMO. But I really don't think we should be pointing fingers at any of them at this point, since we don't know what it's all about.
However.... I tend to believe Crystal has every right to know what is going on, and if it can be confirmed that Ron was abusive to either one of those kids, then she has a right to bring it out in the open. And if it can be confirmed that Misty was negligent in any way, then BOTH of them can be held accountable for that. He left her with the responsibility of two kids that were not hers, and she is too immature to handle it.

Excellent post!

 

[cajun]

I have a relative who works for the SA's office in that area. A complaint has been submitted and they are investigating. He will be charged with a second degree felony.

That is why Misty is off the property and why TN played things off the other day by stating that Misty has "her own home."

I wonder who filed the complaint? I'm sure it's not Misty or Ron's family that did.

 

[illinoismom]

To me the Bio Mom and family are still suspects. Who is to say they didn't have Haleigh taken, in a stunt to get custody back. Crystal is already in trouble for not paying child support.

Just one of the many possibilities...

I agree with this 110%!!!!

 

[Littleone48]

I wonder who filed the complaint? I'm sure it's not Misty or Ron's family that did.

I would hope that the person who did file this is also out helping to search for Haleigh. Way too much time on their hands. IMO

Sorry for sounding angry but I have had it with the age difference (my husband is 6 years older than me) and the post early on about Misty smoking. Even her dad said at first he didn't like it but after seeing how RC treated his daughter and his kids, he was happy that Misty was him.