CA CA - Valencia, 2 WhtFems UP4388 & 4389, 17-35, in riverbed near I-5, Jan'80

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
How did they end up so far from Michigan though? Also have these Does ever had DNA done to determine if they were sisters or otherwise related?
 
How did they end up so far from Michigan though? Also have these Does ever had DNA done to determine if they were sisters or otherwise related?
One of the Jane Does has no DNA available so I guess they can't determine if these women may be related or not.
 
How did they end up so far from Michigan though? Also have these Does ever had DNA done to determine if they were sisters or otherwise related?
I think they may have been runaways. It would make sense. Sherri Jarvis ran away from Minnesota and was found in Texas, 17 hours away and she would likely have gone farther if it weren't for her murder. Michelle Garvey went missing form Connecticut and was found in Texas around 30 hours away. Michelle only had a month to travel that far and she did. Who knows how far Pamela and Patricia could have gone. I think they could have been murdered in 1973-1975. Makes them more likely than Cindy Mellin. Maybe they got money from prostitution as they had no ID on them at the time and if they gave any they would be whisked away back home but that's just a theory. Doug Clark and Carol Bundy targeted runaways and prostitutes to my knowledge.
I never sent Pamela and Patricia, if you want to send you can do it ☺️
Yes but first I am making detailed posts. I think we may have a Sherri Jarvis/Michelle Garvey situation. You can not deny how similar Patricia Spencer's age progression looks to UP4389.
1322UFCA_LARGE.jpg
3081DFMI.jpg

The Doe's reconstruction looks like a sketch of the age progression! Looks more similar than Andria Bailey!
 
(snipped by carbuff)

Yes but first I am making detailed posts. I think we may have a Sherri Jarvis/Michelle Garvey situation. You can not deny how similar Patricia Spencer's age progression looks to UP4389.
1322UFCA_LARGE.jpg
3081DFMI.jpg

The Doe's reconstruction looks like a sketch of the age progression! Looks more similar than Andria Bailey!

I, uh, um...I'm not seeing it. Face shape is different (UID's is roundish, Patricia's is long and narrow), chin is different (Patricia's is longer and larger, UID is show with a slight cleft or bump), forehead and eyebrows are different (UID's is lower, also narrower at top), eyes aren't real close...granted the UID's eyebrows would be an approximation, the rest of the sketch should be closer.
 
Here are detailed posts for each match:
Original
1322UFCA_LARGE.jpg

Patricia Ann Spencer MP11479Valencia Jane Doe (1980) UP4389Possible?
SexFemaleFemaleMatch
RaceWhite/CaucasianWhite/CaucasianMatch
Age1617-24Match
Hair ColorBrownUnknownPossible
Eye ColorBlueUnknownPossible
Height5'3"5'5"-5'9"Possible considering circumstances
Weight120lbs115-130lbsMatch
Estimated D.L.C/D.O.DOctober 31, 19691979-1980Possible considering circumstances/ unlikely
Distinctive FeaturesNone/UnknownNone/Unknown (Skeletal Remains)Match
CircumstancesWent missing on the same day as her classmate, Pamela Hobley.Found with UP4389Match/Possible Considering Circumastances.
DistanceOscoda-Valencia2,383 milesPossible considering circumstances.
Next up is Pamela Hombley!
Original
Original

I admit the jawline is a bit off but apparently the "jawline is an approximation". I think this Doe's lower mandible was never recovered. Upper face looks much closer with the eyes in the same general position. I admit the nose does look slightly off but this may be due to the scar Pamela had on her nose which would not pop up on skeletal remains.
Pamela Sue Hobley MP11478Valencia Jane Doe (1980) UP4388Possible?
SexFemaleUnsure, Likely FemaleLikely
RaceWhite/CaucasianUnsure, Likely CaucasianLikely
Age1517-35Possible Considering Circumstances
Hair ColorBrownBlond/BrownMatch
Eye ColorBrownUnknownPossible
Height5'6"-5'8"5'4"-5'7"Match
Weight100-115lbs120-140lbsPossible Considering Circumstances
Estimated D.O.D/D.L.COctober 31, 19691978-1980Possible Considering Circumstances
Distinctive FeaturesScar on left side of mouth, Scar across bridge of nose.Unknown/None (Skeletal Remains)Match/Possible
CircumstancesWent missing on the same day as her classmate, Patricia Spencer.Found with UP4389Match
DistanceOscoda-Valencia2,383 milesPossible Considering Circumstances
I am also copy-pasting my thoughts on the circumstances here for those who have not read it:

I think they may have been runaways. It would make sense. Sherri Jarvis ran away from Minnesota and was found in Texas, 17 hours away and she would likely have gone farther if it weren't for her murder. Michelle Garvey went missing form Connecticut and was found in Texas around 30 hours away. Michelle only had a month to travel that far and she did. Who knows how far Pamela and Patricia could have gone. I think they could have been murdered in 1973-1975. Makes them more likely than Cindy Mellin. Maybe they got money from prostitution as they had no ID on them at the time and if they gave any they would be whisked away back home but that's just a theory. Doug Clark and Carol Bundy targeted runaways and prostitutes to my knowledge. Police also treated this case as a runaway case early on.
I, uh, um...I'm not seeing it. Face shape is different (UID's is roundish, Patricia's is long and narrow), chin is different (Patricia's is longer and larger, UID is show with a slight cleft or bump), forehead and eyebrows are different (UID's is lower, also narrower at top), eyes aren't real close...granted the UID's eyebrows would be an approximation, the rest of the sketch should be closer.
Then and again this is an age progression and not a Living Photo of Patricia. I also think the "cleft" might be a mistake as I would think that they would make it more pronounced. This is also not listed anywhere that she does have a cleft on her chin. Possibly some artistic liberty. Patricia's living photo have the eyes closer seemingly. This also may have angle issues at play. Eyebrows probably are an estimation as we are working with partial remains.
 
Okay, I was reading too fast, and didn't realize the photo of Patricia wasn't a real photo. Also the two sketches of the UID aren't real similar, now that I look in detail. (I'm partly face blind, so this is hard for me :p Apologies.
 
Also the two sketches of the UID aren't real similar, now that I look in detail.
I feel a little confused of what you meant here. Can you explain what you said a bit more please? I just have a bit of a hard time understanding these things sometimes!
 
I feel a little confused of what you meant here. Can you explain what you said a bit more please? I just have a bit of a hard time understanding these things sometimes!

Never mind, I got confused with the two UIDs and whose sketch was whose. So basically ignore everything I said :p
 
In my limited experience, the sketches can be a lot different from the actual person. Even in cases where the UID is found in tact, the released sketch(s) isn't a good representation of the person once identified. Just look at some of the solved cases and the initial drawing released to the public. Just throwing this out there.
 
In my limited experience, the sketches can be a lot different from the actual person. Even in cases where the UID is found in tact, the released sketch(s) isn't a good representation of the person once identified. Just look at some of the solved cases and the initial drawing released to the public. Just throwing this out there.
I agree. Sherri Jarvis' sketch looked not so much like her. Mainly due to the fact that Sherri looked very old for her age. She could pass as a 16 year old but in reality I think she was 14?
 
I agree. Sherri Jarvis' sketch looked not so much like her. Mainly due to the fact that Sherri looked very old for her age. She could pass as a 16 year old but in reality I think she was 14?

The sketch of UP4389 makes her look like she's 40, at least.
 
The sketch of UP4389 makes her look like she's 40, at least.
I agree. She does look very old. That's why I compared her sketch to Patricia's age progression and not her Living Photo. I thought it would be more accurate.
 
I agree. She does look very old. That's why I compared her sketch to Patricia's age progression and not her Living Photo. I thought it would be more accurate.

Good point; it certainly could reflect how she'd look as an older woman. I'll look at it again (after supper) with that in mind.
 
How about Wanda Priddy for UP4389

Priddy's Stats:
5'4"
120 lbs (though NamUs says 90 lbs)
Brown hair

Circumstances: Priddy vanished on August 29, 1978 from Port Lavaca, Texas. She was last seen by her husband at their apartment. Her car was still parked inside.
 
I wonder if Barbara Monaco could be a possible match for 1367UFCA


Have you seen this child?

The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)

Barbara Jean Monaco – The Charley Project

1765DFVA - Barbara Jean Monaco





Something that caught my attention is that it is mentioned that Barbara Jean Monaco is blind in one eye (although it is unknown which one), could that explain why Jane Doe's right eye is slightly lower than the left?

I am not usually one to raise objections based on geography. People travel. Lots. They hitch rides and grab Greyhound buses across country. They travel long distances. But somebody hauling a body from Virginia Beach to Southern California seems a bit implausible.

Though except for that, she looks like a very good possibility.
 
How about Wanda Priddy for UP4389

Priddy's Stats:
5'4"
120 lbs (though NamUs says 90 lbs)
Brown hair

Circumstances: Priddy vanished on August 29, 1978 from Port Lavaca, Texas. She was last seen by her husband at their apartment. Her car was still parked inside.
Haven't been on this thread for a while. What UID do you mean? UP4388 or UP4389? Your text says UP4389 but links to UP4388. It honestly could work for either though.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
69
Guests online
2,395
Total visitors
2,464

Forum statistics

Threads
603,993
Messages
18,166,308
Members
231,905
Latest member
kristens5487
Back
Top