How did LE come to the conclusion that the public was in no danger almost immediately?
Was there something on her phone?
Had there been problems with someone?
I have always had a feeling that when Jessica got in her car that morning, someone was waiting for her inside ,of course, JMHO
I totally agree , this must have been personal ,otherwise why all the secrecy ? How does it compromise an investigation to declare it murder ? That's why I still think they have a suspect and do not want to cause that person to panic and flee once they hear it's officially a murder investigation and are waiting until they have enough evidence to make charges stick .
Or they are really grasping at straws with no suspects , no evidence and the longer it drags on the more likely the case will go cold.
I can't stop thinking about her son , I have a one year old myself .
So sad
Yeah this
It is worrisome and we have all seen it before
I totally agree , this must have been personal ,otherwise why all the secrecy ? How does it compromise an investigation to declare it murder ? That's why I still think they have a suspect and do not want to cause that person to panic and flee once they hear it's officially a murder investigation and are waiting until they have enough evidence to make charges stick .
Or they are really grasping at straws with no suspects , no evidence and the longer it drags on the more likely the case will go cold.
I can't stop thinking about her son , I have a one year old myself .
So sad
I was reading a bit about LE using drones.
It seems it really speeds up the investigation, taking many photos in a shorter time span as well as searching areas that are not easily accessible, looking for weapons, clues or people.
If the rumors are true about her appearance, and all we have are rumors, I think of a gun shot.
It could still take an autopsy in some situations to determine murder versus selfinflicted.
We have no idea what LE has to work with but something told them that this was not some random nut taking potshots at strangers... no danger to the public
I drove to the road where she was found to the exact spot at dusk , I imagine 630 am would be similar light , it wasShe had a family, a child, many friends, a fiance, a job
If she was dead longer than the last person who saw her said they saw her, wouldn't someone else have noticed?
I mean not an hour or so but many hours?
And this road where she was found.. is it busy? Nobody spotted the car running til the witness took a walk?
Was she killed elsewhere and brought there in the morning?
No information makes for a lot of questions
If LE thinks she was dead longer than when the last person said the saw her alive and there is scientific proof of that, why has there been no arrest?
She had a family, a child, many friends, a fiance, a job
If she was dead longer than the last person who saw her said they saw her, wouldn't someone else have noticed?
I mean not an hour or so but many hours?
And this road where she was found.. is it busy? Nobody spotted the car running til the witness took a walk?
Was she killed elsewhere and brought there in the morning?
No information makes for a lot of questions
If LE thinks she was dead longer than when the last person said the saw her alive and there is scientific proof of that, why has there been no arrest?
I would think that the longer the time passes between her death and any news / advancements in the case the chance of catching a perp diminishes exponentially . They have statistics like that for missing persons , after 3 days of searching the chances you'll now be looking for a body increases by seventy some odd percent .
I'm sure there are statistics on this scenario , too.
I'm not sure if there can be stats on that, because police are always working away in the background (in any case, not just this one), and we have no idea what they already know, and what they are secretly looking into/following. i'm thinking they already pretty much know, as they often do, but still seeking enough evidence that can be brought to trial with hope of a conviction. Hopefully that doesn't equate to also having tunnel vision and discounting other possibilities in the meantime? i always wonder though, if police share a little more info at the beginning of a case, if they might not have been able to gather more statements from people who may have come forward at the time. by this time, so much time has passed, people may forget. For example, what if someone driving out of the village of Drumbo on the evening before, or two evenings earlier, had seen someone putting something into the trunk of a similar car.. but because it has only been reported that she disappeared on her way to work on the Saturday morning, they think it's irrelevant. ... or .. they don't know where she lived, so they don't know that what they saw may be important, or they don't know her car, etc. Wouldn't it make sense to share a little more seemingly minor info in the hopes of potentially receiving more tips? Bugs me.
Inside the car found on Canning Road, just a few kilometres west of Paris, officers found an unresponsive female who was later pronounced deceased by a coroner.
She was driving a black 2007 Volkswagen Rabbit.
<snip>
Shockingly little info other than
-she was reportedly last seen at six thirty am on her way to work in Cambridge
Thanks for the updates Nola1140 & everyone. I didn't know the time was 6:30 before you mentioned it.
fyi, sunrise that day was reported as 6:30 am. http://www.sunrise-and-sunset.com/en/sun/france/paris/2016/august
Just a couple questions. I know not everyone takes a formal maternity leave, but aren't they still 1 year long? Unless she left work early before the baby's birth, her one yr wouldn't be up. Then again, maybe no mat leave.
There is some differing information in the following article in the Brant News:
It also mentions what type of car she drove:
http://www.brantnews.com/news-story/6803430-death-of-woman-found-in-princeton-deemed-suspicious/