NJSleuth91
Former Member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2019
- Messages
- 1,227
- Reaction score
- 7,126
I think when most of us think of someone who is homeless, we think of someone literally living on the street. But I don't think his situation of living in a van and having a job and apparently some disposable income to buy things for his son is necessarily unusual. I know of people who live in their vehicles and work. They are certainly homeless, but they're always clean and their clothing, though not fancy, looks nice. I don't know the full story behind why he has been living in a van for a couple of years, but I wonder if he doesn't make enough to cover rent, but his income, without that concern, is okay for meeting his other needs.
It does make me wonder if this is one reason he is willing to keep doing interviews. I know someone mentioned that 60 Minutes Australia pays for exclusives. If true, that decision might have been somewhat pragmatic on his part.
All MOO.
I read once that in NYC, about 40% of homeless people have jobs. The rent is just too high. From what you guys posted it sounds like Vancouver Island is almost as expensive as, say, the NJ suburbs. Also if Bryer's dad had a criminal record or bad credit it could make it difficult for him to find a place. My hope is that at least the vulture reporter will pay him enough to get a more stable living situation and mental health care.
2. Looks like airsofts are the 'topic' this morning - what I'm surprised about is that no here has noticed or picked up on the vid clip of Bryer with the airsoft, being filmed at Kam McLeod's home property.
Yeah we did remark on the clip. I don't think it showed us much we didn't already know. We already knew that he and Kam played "survivalist games" in the woods around Kam's house, involving camouflage and airsoft guns. Plenty of people that age have the same interests and don't commit acts of violence. I'm not sure why he was wearing bright red sneakers in the clip if he was trying to be a "master of camouflage" though.
A note about BS's eye-colour changing:
Wow that's really interesting!
In the first filmed interview, he said Bryer would use voice-to-text, so it was the phone mishearing him and filling in Kim instead of Kam.
I wonder if that could indicate what his learning difficulty was? Using voice to text sounds like maybe he could have had dyslexia or something.
I know, right? It's not like parents would say "oh yeah, we totally saw the signs. They were just killers waiting to kill."
I think AS's "blaze of glory", getting killed in a shootout with police, etc comments made me think it was *close* to that, hence my original opinion about him and his son and what he knew, but he sure has toned down his rhetoric since.
I don't think he saw Bryer as a killer waiting to kill the whole time. I think he definitely knew Bryer was troubled but was unaware or in denial of the extent of it. A lot of teens are troubled and most of them don't kill innocent people. Usually parents are more concerned about suicide being a possibility as opposed to homicide. I think after the murders happened all of the signs coalesced in his mind and he was like "OMG...."
It was mentioned here that the gun laws in Canada extend to proper weapon storage as well. I wonder if that's one of the reasons why Kam's family is being so quiet: the possibility of culpability because Kam took or was given a firearm for his trip with Bryer.
From what's been said here about Canadian gun laws, they are in serious trouble if it turns out Kam took the gun from their home.
Too many comments to quote on the "were the families' reactions justified" discussion...I don't blame any of the families for any of their reactions. I can totally understand why Chynna's mom is upset that Bryer's dad went to the media like that. I don't think it's true that Bryer's dad turned Bryer into a killer, since as I said it's multi-factorial, and I also think Bryer's dad did own up to his failures as a parent. But am I going to blast a grieving mother of a murder victim for feeling that way? Of course not.
I also don't blame Kam's family for not going to the media. They are under no obligation to dance for the media circus if they want to grieve in private.
I also don't blame Bryer's family for going to the media. I think they are genuinely trying to shed insight on what may have happened. I don't think they have any bad intentions with this, to get sympathy or steal the spotlight. I have issue with the predatory way the media is treating Bryer's dad, and I don't think he has the capacity right now to fully consent to this much exposure and I don't think it's good for his mental health either.
Also I hope I was wrong in the discussion from the other day about how the RCMP might not release cause of death for Kam and Bryer. It sounds like they actually might.