PrayingForMissing
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2011
- Messages
- 474
- Reaction score
- 6,366
I'm leaning towards this as well. Mainly because there are other hikers. And IF she WAS able to get him somewhere with no one seeing (big IF , especially if she has to help him on the hike or he's fighting her or limp or screaming, any scenario), if he's alive, there's a chance he will be found. By other hikers , by park rangers, by the tons of dogs people bring on the trails. He is found, he tells on her, she's done for.I cannot bring myself to believe that she dropped a sick or injured child she has taken care of for two years, off on the side of the road or dropped him over a cliff while he was still alive. How would someone live with those cries in her ears or the sight of that for the rest of her life.
I still think she was taking him to a hospital and he died in the back seat before she got him that far. I think she recognized the trouble she was in to bring a child who, most likely had been deteriorating for several hours either from an intestinal problem or a head injury and the hospital personnel would have had to take him out of the back seat of a pick up truck. The hospital would never have believed any concocted story, they would have looked at her and reacted to an extreme medical neglect. She knew she was in deep trouble.
I think she drove around with him for an hour or so, trying to figure out what to do and concocting a cover story. I think she left his lifeless body somewhere. If she doesn't crack and tell LE where he is, what does LE do next?
I'm thinking he passed already when she placed him wherever Or he was in a state he was so far gone that he was sure not to survive unfortunately IMO