CARIIS
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2012
- Messages
- 25,470
- Reaction score
- 10,693
A French ship that was expected to help in the search for the black box of EgyptAir flight MS804 arrived at the crash site on Tuesday. However, officials in charge of the search said that the ship arrived without the black box signal receiver required for the search.
You have got to be kidding me I'm getting MH370 deja vu
Would Imeristat data help at all for this type of case? And if so how long would it take for them to have the data ready?
smoke was observed from the crew rest area/lavatory
a smell of burning plastics developed in the cabin prompting the crew to stop the climb at about 8500 feet MSL and to return to Lviv for a safe landing about 15 minutes after departure.
The airline reported that the aircraft was examined with all systems found serviceable. A piece of plastics, some cellophane, was identified as source of the smell. The passengers were provided with food, those continuing through Kiev and losing their connections were rebooked onto other connecting flights.
The aircraft was released to depart again about 8 hours after landing and reached Kiev with a delay of 8 hours.
On Apr 18th 2016 Ukraine's National Bureau of Air Accident Investigation (NBAAI) reported that during the initial climb a pungent smell of burning plastics developed in the cabin, flight attendants were unable to identify the source of the odour prompting the captain to return to Lviv. However, the crew did not work the related "Fire, Smoke or Fumes in flight" checklist, all aircraft systems worked normally, no smoke detector triggered. After landing maintenance discovered an odour of burning plastics smell with the right hand engine (CFM56) running and associated bleed air and air conditioning system operating. The odour was identified to be the result of thermal degradation of polymeric material of foreign objects in the right hand engine's ducts, additional foreign objects were also found in the ducts of the left hand engine. Following the removal of the foreign objects tests did not reproduce any further odour. The NBAAI concluded: "The most likely cause of the odour after takeoff from Lviv was the ingestion of foreign objects probably consisting of polymere material into the inner core of the engines, in particular the right hand engine, and thermal degradation of such material causing evaporation or combustion with the release of toxic substances. As result these gasses (steam or smoke) got into the aircraft's air conditioning system and into the passenger cabin."
the crew received a cabin fire indication and decided to divert to Venice for a safe landing on Venice's runway 04R about 30 minutes later.
A replacement Airbus A320-200 registration G-MIDT was dispatched to Venice, resumed the flight and reached London with a delay of 8 hours.
The occurrence aircraft remained on the ground in Venice for 7 hours, then positioned to London Gatwick. The smoke detector indication was identified false. The aircraft resumed service the following morning.
the crew declared PAN reporting a strange smell in the aft cabin which resulted in two flight attendants complaining about head aches. The crew requested medical assistance available upon arrival. The aircraft landed safely on Toulouse's runway 32R about 30 minutes later. After landing the crew advised the odour had dissipated. The flight attendants were taken to a hospital.
A Srilankan Airlines Airbus A330-200, registration 4R-ALJ performing flight UL-891 from Bangkok (Thailand) to Colombo (Sri Lanka), was in the initial climb out of Bangkok's runway 19L when the crew stopped the climb at 4000 feet reporting smoke in the cabin. The aircraft returned to Bangkok for a safe landing on runway 19R about 11 minutes after departure.
A passenger reported there was smoke in the aft cabin.
A Lufthansa Cityline Embraer ERJ-195, registration D-AEMB performing flight LH-2134 from Munich to Muenster (Germany), was climbing out of Munich's runway 26R when the crew stopped the climb at 5000 feet reporting a burning odour in the cockpit. Both crew donned their oxygen masks and returned to Munich for a safe landing on runway 26R about 12 minutes after departure. There were no injuries, the flight crew however was taken to a hospital for medical checks.
The flight was cancelled, the passengers were rebooked onto other flights.
A Lufthansa Cityline Embraer ERJ-195, registration D-AEMD performing flight LH-2311 from Amsterdam (Netherlands) to Munich (Germany), was descending towards Munich when the crew reported smoke on board. The aircraft continued for a safe landing on Munich's runway 26R and taxied to the gate with emergency services in trail.
The occurrence aircraft remained on the ground for 10 hours, then resumed service.
A Jetblue Embraer ERJ-190, registration N309JB performing flight B6-1012 from Chicago O'Hare,IL to Boston,MA (USA) with 54 passengers and 4 crew, was enroute at FL390 about 50nm westsouthwest of Buffalo,NY (USA) when the crew reported a smokey odour in the cockpit and decided to divert to Buffalo. The aircraft landed safely on Buffalo's runway 23 about 15 minutes later.
The airline reported all passengers were safe and are being rebooked onto other flights.
Very interesting reports regarding terror and this crash - more substance than CNN endless regergatation of same ole same ole !
[video=youtube;jaLVSbG3maE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaLVSbG3maE[/video]
I am going to have to seperate posts cause one cant post multple videos in one post. Def better reporting IMO!
Been a few days since I've seen anything reported. Have to agree with your video, why did they put a bomb on this small plane when there are larger planes flying the same route?
It really blows me away that the plane hasn't been found yet and that 2 years after MH370 they're no closer to finding technology to track flights better.
How many days ago did they find the oil slick plus belongings?
It really blows me away that the plane hasn't been found yet and that 2 years after MH370 they're no closer to finding technology to track flights better.
The signals were emitted by the plane's emergency locator transmitter, a device that can manually or automatically activate at impact and will usually send a distress signal. The signals from the emergency locator transmitter are different from the pings emitted by the "black boxes."
Having these signals narrows down the area that the multinational search team has been focusing on -- which a few days ago was described as "about the size of Connecticut." It dramatically decreases the search area to a 5-kilometer (3.1-mile) radius, giving investigators a more specific location to detect pings from the black boxes.
The plane has three emergency locator transmitters, one of which is in the tail, where the flight data recorders are. It wasn't clear where the emergency transmitting device had been located within the plane.
The Egyptian news agency reported that Airbus sent the information to Egyptian authorities, who then relayed the information to the search and rescue units.
Airbus would not comment when asked about the signals, saying: "We are supporting the parties in charge of the investigation and we can't comment, nor do we contribute to any kind of speculation."
The signals from emergency locator transmitters can be picked up by satellite. It is not immediately clear when Airbus received these signals, but they are more commonly identified a few hours after impact -- not a few days later.