This is something I’ve been meaning to do for a few days now when I could find the time, prior to today’s mindblower that other people may be involved. These notes are from RL's warrant. One of the LE (DC?) has stated previously that no one has been excluded. (me again ->) Dead people can be responsible, just not held accountable for those actions. It's my belief, therefore MOO, that RL was in cahoots with RMA. I also have not ruled KAK out for being intertwined in all this due to DC "tells WIBC’s Hammer & Nigel, “there are so many different tentacles to this. Its very complex.”".
Source here.
Yes, it's long, but there's definitely food for thought IMO. Especially considering today's revelation that:
Prosecutor says Richard Allen may not have acted alone
Pg 3, line 10 – On 2/14/17 @ approx. 9:20am, Logan contacted his cousin. “Tell police that ____ came to Logan’s home between 2pm and 2:30pm on 2/13/17 to pick Logan up”. (That name is ~4 letters long if you compare to the letters above) Logan further told ____ (cousin) to say that ___ drove Logan to an aquarium store in Lafayette, Indiana. Logan told _______ (cousin) to say they returned home to Logan’s house between 5:00pm and 5:30pm.
That would give both RL AND RMA an alibi for NOT being at the CS between 2:00-2:30ish… until between 5:00 and 5:30ish (when the LE was notified they were missing (family arrived shortly after 3pm and they weren’t there)). IMO RL is trying to place himself, and some person with a short name, out of the area between the crime window, and starting a few minutes before the actual crime was committed.
1) Why is RL being so specific about two 30-minute windows on the day OF the murders? The first 30-minute window when Libby’s last phone Snapchat pic posted at 2:07 which is right in the middle between 2:00 and 2:30. The latter 30-minute window coinciding with when family notified LE the girls were missing. With all the time in-between that he and ____ were supposed to be in Lafayette.
Why would RL ask a cousin to lie about TWO 30-minute windows if it was as simple as he was driving with a suspended license and didn’t want to get into trouble for that as I’ve seen some speculate? I’ve posted in other threads one thing about people who aren’t telling the truth (as per a book called Gift of Fear Survival Techniques - TOO MANY DETAILS – When people are telling the truth they don’t feel they need to elaborate on their story with ‘too many details’). IMHO I feel RL did that when he was trying to get his cousin to cover for him and asking his cousin to relay “too many details”. Something is just off about that to me.
2) Let’s say the short blacked out name that’s approximately 4 characters long is Rick for argument’s sake. Could RL be trying to protect RMA, giving him/them an alibi of why he was on RL’s property between 2:00 – 2:30 on the day of the murders? (MOO next) “Yeah, he/I was there between 2-2:30 to pick RL up to take him to Lafayette”. (Ditto for when RL & potentially RMA were there between 5-5:30. For all we know RMA could have gone back about that time, pretending he was just out for a leisurely walk on the trail by the bridge when in actuality it could have been to check what might be going on in the area of the bridge about that time.)
Pg 5, Line 15 – Based on investigators experience it is reasonable to believe that the creation of an alibi
prior to the discovery of a crime indicated culpability or knowledge of the crime.
Pg 5, line 17 – LEOs learned that RL had driven on 2/13/17 (between 11:27-11:32) to the transfer station in Delphi to drop off trash.
Pg 5, Line 18 – RL did not ask <cousin> to provide an alibi for his drive to the transfer station on 2/13/17. RL only asked <cousin> to provide an alibi for a trip that would have occurred at the time of the apparent abduction of LG & AW.
Pg 5, Line 23 – Analysis of RL’s cell phone data revealed a text message received by his phone at 10:16pm on 2/13/17. Initial exam of this analysis indicated RL’s phone was likely outside of his residence and in the proximity of where LG & AW’s bodies where located.
Gemmie’s comment – I wonder whatever possessed him to go to the CS when it was between 34-37° outside at 10:16pm? AND the girls hadn't even been found yet. Clean things up? Stage things? Look for Libby's phone? Take pics/souvenirs? Some or all of the above?
Pg 7, Line 30 – Based on the above aforementioned facts, RL was in the area at the time the crime occurred and that he provided false information about his activities during the crime to LE, has a prior propensity for violence, employed others to assist in deceiving LE and plotted an alibi for a crime that had not yet been discovered.
Pg 8, Line 1 – Based on the aforementioned facts, I believe there is probable cause to believe that RL has committed the crime of murder and evidence of that could be found on RL’s property.
Gemmie here. OK, mind blown. This is the first I’ve read RL’s warrant in its entirely.
Pg 8, Line 3 - <re: warrant to search for stuff> ‘including guns and cutting instruments’.
Gemmie here – Both guns and cutting instruments could make a lot of blood evidence which makes me wonder if what they haven’t told us about the CS is they were killed by a ‘cutting instrument’ since they were looking for them in RL house and property. Due to what I've read in RL's warrant, and KAK's as well, I have not excluded any of them, and believe they could all be a part of this "complex with different tentacles" case as per DC (link in first paragraph).
RL warrant:
https://interactive.wthr.com/pdfs/logan-warrrant.pdf
Timeline:
DELPHI TIMELINE: The search for Libby & Abby's killer
Weather history -
Weather in February 2017 in Delphi, Indiana, USA
