peanutJelly
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2020
- Messages
- 617
- Reaction score
- 2,474
DBM double post
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dog hairs were collected on 4 May during the day
P.J. POLICE FILES: FORENSIC COLLECTIONS 4 MAY 2007
The sniffer dogs were brought in to search in the early hours of 4 May.
P.J. POLICE FILES: G.N.R SNIFFER DOGS REPORTS
IMO it seems unlikely that any samples were taken before the early hours of 4 May
I'd imagine they'd need more than just 'lived there once" to get a warrant to search to that extent and to commit that many resources? That would be a costly enterprise IMOInteresting he said police have known about the garden for 2 years and only just searched it now
Wonder if they had trouble getting a warrant?
I'd imagine they'd need more than just 'lived there once" to get a warrant to search to that extent and to commit that many resources? That would be a costly enterprise IMO
Is it possible for the German sleuhers to say whether German LE would need far more to dig to that extent
I'd imagine they'd need more than just 'lived there once" to get a warrant to search to that extent and to commit that many resources? That would be a costly enterprise IMO
Is it possible for the German sleuhers to say whether German LE would need far more to dig to that extent
I'm still trying to figure out how CB's lawyer can sit and state his client will NEVER co-operate with prosecutor, especially given the fact he hasn't yet been questioned/charged, nobody knows what evidence (if any) has been uncovered to prove him guily or innocent. Surely any lawyer whose client is to be innocent until proven guilty would be very eager to propose that "innocence" by saying "of course my client will do ANYTHING/answer any questions etc if will help to solve this/clear his name and so let the search continue for whoever did this etc"? It just seems like a stand-off before anything has even begun.
This is a really interesting point. A significant date in his life? Could be linked with rejection ie being sent to the children’s home if anyone knows date he left home. Or linked in some way with whatever he did that finally led mother to realize she couldn’t manage him?
Also stronger language should be used instead of child *advertiser censored* like child abuse images.The word "peadophile" should be abolished completely! That word is a disgrace!
It should make place for something like: child hater, child molester, child abuser, child traumatisor, child killer or something like that!
I had a similar thought to that too. It's the start of the tourist season, both MM and IG were tourists. Would make sense to do it when it is quieter and less people around. I know Peggy wasn't a tourist but personally I don't see any link to CB there at the moment, no evidence I've seen that places him in the country at that time.Or, more simply, just the time of year where there are more opportunities to commit these sorts of crimes?
It's the start of summer when families are more likely to take holidays and kids explore. In Europe, I would hazard a guess that there's a higher probability of abduction cases to take place at this time of year.
Might she have been talking about the dogs CB used to walk for the elderly lady that was spoke about?CB Dogs
Sexta às 9 Episódio 21 - de 05 Jun 2020 - RTP Play - RTP
42:25
This lady in PDL says that she saw CB many times in the early summer, before the disappearance, that CB went with the VW to shop at the supermarket and walk with his dog (At first she says: "the dog" but at the end she says: "with the dogs he had").
I'm double checking atm
Before or after the search dogs, wouldn't effect the fact the hairs could belong to CB's dogs.
Dog hairs were collected on 4 May during the day
P.J. POLICE FILES: FORENSIC COLLECTIONS 4 MAY 2007
The sniffer dogs were brought in to search in the early hours of 4 May.
P.J. POLICE FILES: G.N.R SNIFFER DOGS REPORTS
IMO it seems unlikely that any samples were taken before the early hours of 4 May
Yes, I think it is recent information that has come to light that prompted it rather than waiting for a warrant for 2 years.When CBs lawyer said the police have known about the garden/allotment CB owned for a couple of years - maybe they’ve just found out about the cellar hence the search. They stopped searching after the cellar was found. It seems CB is a textbook psychopath even manipulating his lawyer to believe CB is not a monster, many psychopaths are charming and friendly to hide who they really are.
Also stronger language should be used instead of child *advertiser censored* like child abuse images.