Jaxson
Your barkin' up the wrong tree
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2007
- Messages
- 1,416
- Reaction score
- 9
That is what I am having such trouble with when it comes to these people. They are being brutally honest.
Yes!, Like they are their own worst enemies
That is what I am having such trouble with when it comes to these people. They are being brutally honest.
The luck part was a minor factor in the equation, which is why I put it last. As for the father out for the night, same answer: people in the neighborhood might certainly see him leave or know already he was starting a new job and working it that night. Ditto relatives. Tritto lucky perps.How would this person who had been in the house also know that the father was out for the night?
As for a kidnapper getting lucky and selecting the right door to open to abduct this baby, the odds of that are so remote that I don't enter it into the equation of trying to pursue the truth in this case. MOO.
If a verified local knows from a credible source they can say male or female yes. But we can't sleuth the person other than what is in the news.
They were certainly making a show of it today, perhaps in case in a jury trial the defense suggests his or her client was focused on at the expense of other possible suspects. I think it was a CYA exercise in front of cameras, basically.
LOLOL. Yes, I doubt many in Johnson County could be considered "a working class crowd." Snobs!Ha Ha! No it's not! Johnson county is more like Beverly Hills dropped into the middle of the midwest![]()
How hard is it for LE to find out these ten people had an alibi? Why would Jeremy throw Debbie under the bus and say she is the only one not to be cleared (if it wasn't true)?
Could be. They made a big play of it, coming in with their lights a-flashing.I think they had someone in mind as the possible perp and wanted to see if an officer the same size could get in easily.
Fine, eliminate that one. I don't think that was the case either. But it has to be listed in any list of possibilities.I don't buy the "got lucky" factor either. And I don't buy that a burglar chose this house, with lights on, to rob and then said, "oh a baby' think I'll take her too." Either someone went in for the baby specifically or no one went in at all, IMO.
I think they had someone in mind as the possible perp and wanted to see if an officer the same size could get in easily.
You're welcome!http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...n-carrying-baby-wearing-only-a-diaper_NWe-tAb
Thanks wfgodot for the info and the link.. Now why in the he!! Would LE neither confirm or deny that they were even following this acct as a lead.. Why not say of course we're following any and all leads.. But nope they don't.. Instead they repeatedly state, THEY HAVE NO LEADS!".. I don't get it!
This is someone not related to these parents who is stating they eye witnessed seeing a male at midnight, on the very night in question, during the time in question.. This IMO lends much credence to the mother's story IMO.. WTH?
They don't even know that whoever got in (if anyone did) got in through the window, let alone the size of the perp.
The luck part was a minor factor in the equation, which is why I put it last. As for the father out for the night, same answer: people in the neighborhood might certainly see him leave or know already he was starting a new job and working it that night. Ditto relatives. Tritto lucky perps.
Could have been random, could have been planned, could have been a bit of both. Certainly, odds suggest that someone in the house will be involved, which is why I've referred to that factor many times over the last many threads. On a percentage basis, this one's wrapped up already. But sometimes long odds come into play, and percentages turn out to be not so indicative.
I don't know which will prove to be the case here.
Could be. They made a big play of it, coming in with their lights a-flashing.
Quite true. I have the luxury of sitting here and making what I hope are informed choices. I'm not a detective, nor do I claim any special abilities.I guess when I look at these unsolved cases I do it in a different way. I try to narrow the list of possible suspects as much as possible. If something doesn't make sense, like a random perp getting into the house but putting the screen back on the window, then selecting the right room that the baby is in, then taking three cell phones for no good reason, and just happening to be doing this on the perfect night when the father is gone, I RULE IT OUT. When I rule out something I shouldn't, it doesn't sit right in my thoughts and I end up putting it back as a possibility. In this case, it feels completely correct to rule out anyone who didn't have intimate knowledge of that house, where Lisa was, and the circumstances surrounding JI's work.
That narrows the list down quite a bit, and thankfully so. You see, if a detective doesn't do that, if he is a fence sitter, the case never gets solved.
Granted, we don't get all the information or see all the evidence, so it is harder to make decisions and solve the case. But that is why I am on this website, to try and solve the cases I post on. And I feel very comfortable narrowing the list of suspects to a dozen, and I also feel very comfortable that LE has indeed narrowed it down to this couple, even though it is based on JI's words. MOO.
Not sure, let me look. It's basically only an LE guy, crawling through a window after removing the screen, I think. I've seen still photos.Is there a link to The video of the reinactment? If so could someone share it please. TIA
http://www.nbcactionnews.com/dpp/ne...n-carrying-baby-wearing-only-a-diaper_NWe-tAb
Thanks wfgodot for the info and the link.. Now why in the he!! Would LE neither confirm or deny that they were even following this acct as a lead.. Why not say of course we're following any and all leads.. But nope they don't.. Instead they repeatedly state, THEY HAVE NO LEADS!".. I don't get it!
This is someone not related to these parents who is stating they eye witnessed seeing a male at midnight, on the very night in question, during the time in question.. This IMO lends much credence to the mother's story IMO.. WTH?