Sincere thanks to you both you have been kind with your time answering questions hereI am so highly curious as to what Attorney David Freedman has up his sleeve when the defense's side is presented. I noticed they didn't have many questions for the last few witnesses and when they did they seemed to be beating around the bush. But on the other hand, what can be said to defend such damning evidence? I am very curious about TM having blood on his hands in the police photos afterwards. I was stunned when I saw the crime scene photos and saw what looked like to me bloody fingerprints smeared on the door casing. I wondered if somehow they are going to try to spin their ridiculous story and say they were TM's fingerprints. Did the vile man finger paint in JC's blood after the murder? To be as clean as he was there HAS to be a reason for him to have blood on him in the areas it was shown.
With all of that being said with what has been presented so far, there is NO WAY I could look at Jason's injuries and their lack thereof and not convict them.
Thursday was a great day for the prosecution!! IMO
J4J[emoji172]
Sent from my SM-T561 using Tapatalk