It is one thing to set an innocent man free, but quite another to get a serial child killer off death row and up for parole every year.
But yet from a defense attorney's perspective such a feat would impress his peers. One must be careful not to assimilate a monster's defender to being one him/herself. Even when it involves the most unsavory cases a defense attorney's role is a crucial element of our justice system and by declining to fulfill his duties -get the best possible deal for his client regardless of what said client is charged with or has been convicted of- an attorney would be betraying the Constitution and failing the justice system. It takes guts to defend someone everyone else wants to lynch on the spot, especially on a public defender's fee (most pervert killers aren't rich) especially considering the public resentment such a case is bound to attract that will be directed to the monster's attorney who often despises his client just as strongly as everyone else but can't allow himself the luxury of expressing his sentiment. Like the saying goes it's a dirty job but someone has to do it.
And no, I'm not a lawyer myself, in fact I usually don't trust them much (my ex-wife was an attorney). But working with scum because it's one's duty does not make one scum, even the worst Nazi war criminals had defense attorney's appointed to defend them at Nuremberg, and some did an impressive job since not all of the accused were sentenced to death, an astonishing accomplishment considering the unspeakably heinous nature of the crimes their clients were charged with.
This man having defended a child killer should not weigh in any peer recognition of his accomplishments.