MaxManning
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2015
- Messages
- 1,438
- Reaction score
- 8
In regards to the bleached pants. I'm not sure if it's in documents or if it was rumour, but I remember reading that Scott was "concerned" about having blood on his clothes because they were washed with some of the kids' clothes. It was one of the things that he said that have made people question him. If 'anyone' in that household had blood on their clothes, it's reasonable to think they would use bleach in the wash?
The key..... take away that it was found in odd circumstances, and that it was Lenk that found it.... I find it extremely questionable that it had no other DNA on it, just SA's. That's what I can't get past.
MaxManning.... thanks for the probability and plausibility post.... next time wait until I'm on my 2nd cup of coffee though!!! :happydance: I had to read it twice, way too many big words when only on first cup ;-)
Sorry, I do ramble! But in short, none of us can be certain of anything, but we are all using plausibility and probability to create opinions. The more we discuss and uncover aspects we had not considered, the more that can change our evaluations.
Great example is The Duchess informing me that the bill of sale was for the CAR , not the PICTURES. Big difference.
You are correct, in the dassey appeal transcripts there is a coworker of tadych that gives a statement about scott tadych's concern.