MittenScarpetta
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 6, 2018
- Messages
- 1,830
- Reaction score
- 8,343
The risk is substantial BUT what if only a couple of the victims were the targets and the rest were simply killed because they had to be.I picked up on that but I can’t make the connection between the death penalty if caught. The motive can’t be something small it has to be something pretty significant for the risk the killers took killing 8 people. Not 1 or 2 but 8. It seems as though at least 1 at each scene either had to know something, have seen something, were involved in something or were a threat. I can see where some were at the wrong place at the wrong time.
But the risk is substantial.
What if only 4 people had been home that night? Would only 4 people had been killed or would 8 people still had been killed wherever they may have been?
That’s one of the factors that makes this difficult to nail down one motive. We don’t know who the killers were truly after. Yes, they killed 8 people but that doesn’t mean that 8 people were their primary targets.
IMO, there’s 5 people who could have been the primary target, which person(s) was it though? Was it a few of them as a group that royally ticked someone off? Or was it just one person?
FR is not on my list as a primary target, neither is HHG. But someone still went in their home and killed them while they lay in bed. We’ve seen videos of how far FR & CR1’s homes were from eachother. They were relatively close but not close enough that FR would’ve seen or heard anything that night. He was also in bed, which tells us he probably didn’t see or hear anything that night or he would’ve been up right?
Why did someone shoot a 20 year old petite young woman 5x in the face, but shot a 40 year old grown, larger sized man once in the eye? It does not make sense.
What does Occams Razor tell us?