I believe she was there just to testify to the chain of custody regarding the Snapchat video.Why was the person from SnapChat needed??? If I'm following this, the snapchat only indicates the clothes AM had on earlier in the evening of murders? Was there an objection??
Yes, that was shown in court yesterday.I believe the Snapchat video features PM recording AM standing next to a drooping tree on the property. This is part of the activity DH described in his opening statement where AM/PM rode around the property checking out recently planted trees. The significance of the video is also that AM is wearing long pants and a blue shirt -- clothing different from what he was wearing when police arrived at the crime scene.
I believe the Snapchat video features PM recording AM standing next to a drooping tree on the property. This is part of the activity DH described in his opening statement where AM/PM rode around the property checking out recently planted trees. The significance of the video is also that AM is wearing long pants and a blue shirt -- clothing different from what he was wearing when police arrived at the crime scene.
Driving around looking at pine trees they planted. Iirc
JMO, to validate the SnapChat video, that it had been posted on SnapChat, correct date and time, etc. People do copy those kinds of videos and alter them, so assume the prosecution wants someone from the company to verify its accurate, not altered.Why was the person from SnapChat needed??? If I'm following this, the snapchat only indicates the clothes AM had on earlier in the evening of murders? Was there an objection??
I also keep thinking about dear Judge Newman who just lost his own son at only 40. It must be unbearable for him to watch this case with the potential that this entitled scoundrel may have *murdered* his son. What a sad and unfair twist of fate. IMHO.
I just love Judge Newman -- I feel like he's fair, wise, appropriately tough, and definitely in charge of his courtroom. MOO.