You know something else that has occurred to me. If TH did such a haphazard job in getting rid of Alanna why wouldn't they have found more of his DNA on her? You would think that his DNA would have been all over her. But if I remember correctly they only listed in two separate places. I know that this all they needed, but I find that odd. IMO
I recall in the Rebecca Zahau case, the investigators admitted that they didn't test every inch of the rope she was hung with. I'm not sure how they decide where to take swabs for testing and where they don't. I do think he made some effort to clean her off, but it's just a theory, and I don't have details.
I am guessing because he used some sort of liquid to get rid of DNA on her body.
I believe I read Holder washed the body off with a hose! but I could be wrong maybe I got the stories mixed up....
I
think I theorized that, but it certainly isn't a fact! I know how muddy everything gets when you've read 13 threads…
I read a true story once and now cannot remember where this happened except in a wealthy place in Michigan.
A man wanted to be superintendent of schools, but his daughter and her hubby were drug addicts. He thought that would destroy his chances , so he put them in a vat of lye. Can't remember anything else about it.
Easy Off type oven cleaner (any brand) is mostly lye. It will burn your skin if you get it on you. Lye is a base, the opposite of an acid on a Ph scale. Esessentially eat a hole in your skin if you don't get it off. Bleach is also a base.
ps. I think the body was left on purpose. Right there, on purpose.
I agree, but I think the location was chosen either because no one happened to be around when the vehicle transporting Alanna got to that stop sign, so it was an opportunity to dump her unnoticed, and/or because the person leaving her there thought she would get picked up with the trash.
I don't think the location had any meaningful significance, but I could be wrong. Are you thinking something else?
I think they were found with the body.
Not on the body but with it. Imo
That's what I think too. The search warrant described "the victims entire body and clothing were wet with an unknown liquid." Some have theorized that that was referring to the purple underwear, but I immediately interpreted it to mean that her wet clothing was in the bag with her, but not on her. That's just an assumption on my part, and I could be wrong.
I also assume that the small pink sock seized in the search is Alanna's, but we'll see.
Just pondering here -- because, to tell the truth, I've never gotten straight in my head all the details of trash pick up -- when it actually happened in the neighborhood where Alanna was left, the street/intersection she was at:
. RSBM
I don't think anyone has gotten it straight about when the trash was picked up. It's definitely a detail I would love to pin down for certain.