Hello sleuths. This may sound OT but please bear with me. Tonight I watched a Dateline about a 1984 murder of a popular SMU sorority girl. Police looked at an allegedly bad-tempered ex-boyfriend, the then-current boyfriend, and a male acquaintance whom they wrongly assumed she had rejected. The third guy was their suspect but they had no evidence and the case went very cold. More than 20 years later, her college roommate, who had become a PI to try and solve the case, started bugging the cops to test the DNA evidence, given new technology. Turns out the perp was a previously convicted sex offender who had been out on parole when the young woman was murdered. He'd knocked on her door and asked to use her bathroom, and she'd let him in.
My point in bringing this up is that we armchair sleuths, who absolutely have nowhere near sufficient evidence to figure out the Missy Bevers case, are focusing on jealous/spurned/scorned/would-be lover scenarios. It could be that one of those is it. It also could be that she found out something she wasn't supposed to know and was silenced, or that the couple's financial problems played an important part. However, it's also possible that someone unknown to Missy, her family and friends followed her in town and/or on the Internet, stalked her undetected and killed her because he/she wanted to murder her for any senseless, unreasonable reason.
My son is a staunchly against SM, he values his freedom. We discussed case, he believes MB stalked, end of subject. Seriously, catfished. I'm leaning toward this too. Women with families don't typically kill; no?