If Helen had died after marrying Stewart, he could have been more than £1 million better off
The prosecution have to find some reason as to what would have motivated Stewart to kill Helen, so think lets jump onto her wealth.
A nice idea that, but sadly just not true.
And as you now know if she had died before the wedding, the consequences financially, were dire.
Just suppose that Stewart and Helen had married in September, five months later.
How much better off could he have been an hour after their wedding?
How much better off could he have been if they had married before Helen died? Possibly more than £1million better off.
So why on earth would he have not waited until after their wedding?
http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/incoming/live-helen-bailey-murder-case-12612181