Or EC was worried... Worried by his behaviour without knowing the reason behind it.
Yes he might have been doing the head banging at home too
Or EC was worried... Worried by his behaviour without knowing the reason behind it.
Suddenly emailing work to say he didn’t want to carry a gun anymore — what’s the significance?
It certainly seems like another sign of his mental deterioration in the days after the crime. Or is there a possibility he had a gun off duty and used it that night?
Yes, the report contradicts the earlier information that he was on duty at the US embassy in Nine Elms until 8pm on 3 March.
Maybe he got her in the car, then she managed to open the door to try to get away and he got out of the drivers side and left the door open, and that was the moment they were caught on camera. It's hard to say since it was probably just a couple of seconds as the bus was driving by. ImoTwo front passenger doors open seems a bit odd unless there were two people in the vicinity. I mean you get in the car, you pull the door shut..get out of the car, close it before walking off..something about that is bothering me.
Okay, I am NOT at all a car person and I’m not sure how to google something like this - wise car people please help!Two front passenger doors open seems a bit odd unless there were two people in the vicinity. I mean you get in the car, you pull the door shut..get out of the car, close it before walking off..something about that is bothering me.
How come only this Scottish paper has all the info?
White Vauxhall Astra. That was/wasn't car at lights on the Tfl camera then? Did anyone here see the Astra?
That was a Ford KAWas the burnt out car found definitely an Astra? Which begs the question, if that was WC hire car .. how did he get home from there?
Could be. Didn't someone say there was an ambulance at the house before he was arrested? Or did I imagine that? At one point there were conflicting reports about ambulances. ImoYes he might have been doing the head banging at home too
I wonder if it could be WC initially opened the passenger door from the drivers seat to offer her a lift home, possibly under the pretence of an officer (warrant card) helping out in a car that may pass as an unmarked police car (as another poster pointed out upthread), which may mean the MSM theorising he used his status/warrant card to coerce SE into the car might have had a little more behind it, and - when SE refused, he put his hazards on and got out and then changed tact to ‘arresting’ her under possible a lockdown rouse or simply kidnapping her - whilst this was happening, both doors may have appeared open without needing SE to have complied.
Very intriguing new development.
I think so. At least in the US we would. I think someone said it's the same in the UK.If he pleads guilty and there isn’t a long drawn out trial will we still get to see the evidence against him?
Wonder if he has had a full on mental break of some form.... that he had moments of clarity an emailed about the fire arm etc in the hopes that he could reduce chance of hurting someone...
Or he is just a nasty piece of work and has tried setting up his defence..
I must say I am slightly concerned that this hearing has been over-reported. All the reports in local press etc rely on a syndicated Press Association release.
I’m worried that PA have slipped up here issuing a release that they shouldn’t have given reporting restrictions?
Okay, I am NOT at all a car person and I’m not sure how to google something like this - wise car people please help!
I’ve a European car and I live in a country where we drive on the left. So my steering wheel is not on the same side as the lever for my bonnet.
Whenever I’ve had occasion to open my bonnet (hood, I guess for US) I open my drivers and passenger door at the same time.
It wouldn’t seem strange to me to see a car with both doors open with hazards on.
(in the UK they also drive on the left.)
Yes he might have been doing the head banging at home too