LancelotLink
Better Days
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 5,371
- Reaction score
- -26
You have to issue a warning next time, I don't have a change of clothes with me and I almost peed myself laughing. :laugh: :laughcry:
Once again, WESH quote: "In his letter, Mason said there is a good faith reason not to oppose the motion, given the potential future impact on Baez."
What future impact? This is a man who ran bikini shops and did odd jobs because it took him years to pass the bar for "ethical" reasons (deadbeat dad) and basically had a rather lethargic career mostly handling DUI cases until this fell into his lap.
After which he managed to pull every lowdown, dirty trick available including fighting a gag order to flounce around on Geraldo and to give sleazy press conferences and file "motions" full of unsubstantiated innuendo about witnesses like RK. Not to mention spending two years and a quarter million dollars or more that he and his client used publicity to raise, with almost no discernible work product, so that the state had to pick up the tab for the bulk of what should have clearly been done in 2008. All the while whining and making a travesty out of filing a proper motion and speaking decently or respectfully in court. He had one of the highest rated judges and couldn't wait to try to get him to recuse himself on an inane technicality. He created a situation with two PI's that are so unprofessional their actions may border on the criminal (JL and DC both are in hot water). He is the poster boy of unprofessional behavior in and out of court and has earned himself many well-deserved nicknames on the "world wide web". The fact he has a client that he should have tried to plea out but instead wasted time and resources manufacturing Spaghetti SODDI scenarios so sordid they set a new low by targeting the many dedicated volunteers who searched for the victim has sent a message to the entire world that he wouldn't know how to behave ethically or to manage a career decently if he was given a map. He flushed that detritus himself despite help from many seasoned professionals.
Of all the weak things this defense has said, the fact that CM is acting like JB has any kind of reputation to even save is the most laughable of them all. He may play a lawyer on TV but his actions resemble something off the old Gong Show. And what about ANYTHING the defense has done has shown an iota of "good faith" to the state? Ever.
IF JA does not oppose the motion to vacate and If (although I seriously doubt it) HHJP does grant this motion, will the defense still have to file the reports of their expert witnesses? Because the court vacated the sanction motion, did it also vacate its order about the expert's reports having to be written and turned over within 20 days?
If HHJP grants this motion then what will he do to Baez the next time he WILFULLY ( not by carelessness or lack of experience) disregards the Court's order ?
![]()
CASH IT MR. ASHTON and don't fall for this poor pitiful young 40 something BS -- his own behavior has already done his 'career' more harm that the sanctions. That was actually the best thing for his career -- if he can get his head out of his ego long enough to change his ways.
Demonstrate leadership.
_IF_ the Defense had now fully complied with the Court's order on the discovery _THEN_ you could consider a break on the sanction and fine.
The WHOLE point of the sanction and fine was that JB had not complied with the Court's order on discovery and did not consider it necessary to seek an extension.
So ... the Defense's priority is to try to retract the sanction and fine ... putting the card before the horse. The priority should be to FULLY satisfy the discovery requirements before this motion should ever be filed and/or considered. If it was retracted then the Defense is off-the-hook and continue the games.
Fully comply with the Court's order on discovery and then ... maybe ... file a motion to reverse. Sheeesh! Priorities. The SA filed the sanction motion because they were not getting compliance. You don't seek relief BEFORE you comply.
This is more of CM's good old boy puffed up double speak. He's stepping up at the last moment to save his buddy Baez from the nasty sanction...the letter is condescending and gives the impression he expects JA to roll over and not oppose him. I think it was CM who gave JB enough rope to hang himself and pretty sure he was JB's greatest cheerleader and encouraged him all the way.
Now he sits back and pulls the my young and inexperienced co-counsel is at fault and for the sake of the case so far, there better not be any repercussions. A thinly veiled threat no doubt, he is playing everyone and I hope HHJP takes that into account because I know he sees CM for what he is.
I also want to say Baez isn't young, 40 while not old is certainly not youthful, he is inexperienced because he couldn't get licensed for years because they just didn't want him practicing law..and finally, I keep reading CM is a hot shot but I have seen nothing to confirm that from the past or from his present debacle in the Casey Anthony case.
2:00pm
So do you guys think JB knew CM would submit this letter to JA? What do you think JB thinks of this letter?
It reminds me of when I was in elementary school. There was this weird, bed-wetting, loser kid that lived down the block and all the other kids hated him and didn't want to play with him. He was super annoying and just socially inept, even at that young age. His mom used to beg our parents to make us play with him, and give us all sorts of candy, etc if we'd go there and tolerate him. I wonder how that kid would've felt knowing that we were only nice to him because his mommy went behind his back and begged.
Woooooo...... I spent so much time LMAO, rolling around on the floor that the buzzards started to circle.
I can't help but notice what is missing from this letter. There's no "I'm sorry," no "I regret my actions.....," and no "throwing myself on the mercy of the court."
All there is? "My buddy's kinda slow, so cut him a break, huh, or he'll never get a date for the prom?"
UNdignified, UNprofessional, and UNfreakingbelievable.
IMHO - this is CM interpretation that JA is considering it because he mentioned it.
I think it would be a huge mistake if JA did not oppose the motion for reconsideration and oppose dismissing the sanctions as the latest motion was full of lies and convenient twarts. <---- new word, look for it soon in a dictionary near you. There will be a photo of the team.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Intermezzo
WESH just reported they HAVE a copy of Baez's check and a letter written by Mason to Jeff Ashton asking him NOT to cash it..and hopes he will not argue against their Motion for Reconsideration
lol.. i'm wonderin if JA had the same reaction when he read that letter
this defense is totally unreal
for this to play out - and I would love to see it happen:
I think Mr. Ashton should stand up and read CM's letter in open court and then spend the next 5 minutes talking about how he agrees with CM that JB's inexperience in matters such as this, and his ignorance of rule of discovery (due to his inexperience) that caused hiim to willfully violate the Judge's ruling. JB would have to sit there, with the cameras on him and listen to this and he could not do a thing about it. Mr. Ashton could then magnanimously agree not to cash the check and not contest the order to vacate the sanctions, and he sits down.
HHJP then denies the motion to vacate the sanctions with no further discussion and adjourns for the day. Oh wouldn't that be nice?
Wow, I had no idea you grew up in Kissimmee.