2011.01.25 Defense Requests More Time to Submit Expert Reports

[CarolinaMoon]

Bock's report was the first one turned in and she was deposed. So, the Motion to Strike on root growth must be for other reasons.

 

[nums24]

*puts up the muzikman signal* Where is our document superhero! We need him!

I can't wait to see the response to the defense's supplemental witness list. It should be GOOD. And I am guessing right now, laying down a Monopoly money bet of $100 that Reichs is SO not testifying at trial.

Here is the state's response: http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26875738/detail.html

 

[Paintr]

I just noticed this comment from Hal's blog.

So does anyone know if the DT missed today’s deadline to submit the expert reports?
Reply Posted by: dawnisis | Tuesday, February 15, 2011 at 5:38 PM

HAL’S NOTE: They did not. The state attorney’s office says everything that was due by today is in, my colleague Anthony Colarossi reports.
Posted by: halboedeker | Tuesday, February 15, 2011 at 5:47 PM

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/ent...hi-belich.html

Would I be considered a terrible person if I admit that I am a bit disappointed? :blushing:

 

[kaRN]

Murder Docket Updated:

02/15/2011 Motion to Strike Defendant's Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence (Plant or Root Growth)

02/15/2011 Motion to Strike Defendant's Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence Pursuant to Frye (Chloroform)

Could these have been filed because the defense failed to file the reports on time?

Exactly what I was thinking!!!

 

[NoNameLeft]

You would think they would have AT LEAST filed a notice of compliance. We're going to see the reports anyway. Someone will file a request to the SA to see them. And the SA will be required by law to hand them over.

Yes, the defense only files stupid stuff like the letter to Jeff Ashton about not cashing the check. And you would think some news station would request these documents. I posted something about that a few weeks ago when the defense handed over some reports (Bock, Furton, Huntington, Eikelenboom) without filing them with the clerk. But since the media didn't request those reports, I starting to wonder if they are interested in getting them at all. :waitasec:

 

[NoNameLeft]

Murder Docket Updated:

02/15/2011 Motion to Strike Defendant's Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence (Plant or Root Growth)

02/15/2011 Motion to Strike Defendant's Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence Pursuant to Frye (Chloroform)

Could these have been filed because the defense failed to file the reports on time?

During the last status hearing, Baez was complaining about not receiving a response to these motions, and how Judge Strickland had ordered the State to file a response within 2 weeks. Mr. Ashton then explained his intention was to write a response, but that he was waiting on discovery from Baez. So either Baez handed over the discovery or the State got tired of waiting.

 

[faefrost]

During the last status hearing, Baez was complaining about not receiving a response to these motions, and how Judge Strickland had ordered the State to file a response within 2 weeks. Mr. Ashton then explained his intention was to write a response, but that he was waiting on discovery from Baez. So either Baez handed over the discovery or the State got tired of waiting.

Possibly. But the tone from the states motion to strike was that the defense submitted no supporting scientific evidence. They offered alot of opinion conclusions from the defense lawyers themselves, but nothing else to really hand the arguments on. So they may not have gotten much of anything regarding these two subjects?

 

[faefrost]

Murder Docket Updated:

02/15/2011 Motion to Strike Defendant's Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence (Plant or Root Growth)

02/15/2011 Motion to Strike Defendant's Motion to Exclude Unreliable Evidence Pursuant to Frye (Chloroform)

Could these have been filed because the defense failed to file the reports on time?

Ooooo! I just had a nasty thought about this. And I hope I am wrong, but it would be sooo JB.

We have been watching that filing deadline and assuming that JB will either file actual reports or ignore it. We forget his other tendency of tossing in half 'ed materially insufficient materials at the absolute last minute. So JA may have gotten a pile of paper from JB. But there may not be anything in it beyond JB's normal crayon scrawls and vague summaries.

And what happens if that is the case? If this is what he did, then you can very clearly see what JB's purpose was when he raised the question of what happens if the state does not depose the witnesses? and basically attempted to shame and embarrass the state into promising the court that they would hold those depositions. And JA's motions to strike may be the best possible counter to what JB is attempting.

 

[NoNameLeft]

Possibly. But the tone from the states motion to strike was that the defense submitted no supporting scientific evidence. They offered alot of opinion conclusions from the defense lawyers themselves, but nothing else to really hand the arguments on. So they may not have gotten much of anything regarding these two subjects?

Well, the root growth is Dr. Bock and she was just deposed on Feb 12. So I assume they waited for that depo to respond to this particular motion.

And who was supposed to be their 'chloroform expert', Dr. Logan?

ETA: And yes, looking at the fact the State wants to strike them, I doubt that they got any new info regarding these subjects.

 

[nums24]

Prosecutor Wants Baez Held In Contempt Of Court
Casey Anthony Attorney Missed Deadline, State Claims

http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26942307/detail.html

Read State's Motion for Rule To Show Just Cause: http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26942318/detail.html

"We are a bit confused," Baez wrote in the email. "I understood it to mean that if we were objecting to anything not in our motion that it should be in writing. That was also my understanding as to what was discussed at the status hearing. I have also discussed the matter with Mr. Mason and he is just as confused if not more."

 

[Solace]

Prosecutor Wants Baez Held In Contempt Of Court
Casey Anthony Attorney Missed Deadline, State Claims

http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26942307/detail.html

Read State's Motion for Rule To Show Just Cause: http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26942318/detail.html

Cheney is confused also. Are these two competent to do any of this?

 

[sumbunny]

These two attorney's have a license to practice law? WTH?

This isn't Cm's first rodeo. How can he be confused as to JBP's order?

I am a numbskull and clearly understand that they were supposed to take a crayon and paper, and write down what they
don't like about the testing the state had done..DUH!

WHATS so hard about that?

 

[Macushla]

Prosecutor Wants Baez Held In Contempt Of Court
Casey Anthony Attorney Missed Deadline, State Claims

http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26942307/detail.html

Read State's Motion for Rule To Show Just Cause: http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26942318/detail.html

I had to look at the date of this post, because I thought I had accidently clicked on the date of the last Contempt motion

I have read Judge Perry's motion and I understood it. JB is claming that MC is also confused? WOW! I have 'here we go again' running through my mind right now. I wonder how Judge Perry is going to handle this one?

 

[sumbunny]

I had to look at the date of this post, because I thought I had accidently clicked on the date of the last Contempt motion

I have read Judge Perry's motion and I understood it. JB is claming that MC is also confused? WOW! I have 'here we go again' running through my mind right now. I wonder how Judge Perry is going to handle this one?

Baez and CM better break out their wallet.

We can only hope sanctions will be on the agenda! (hoping it's the $500.00 a day one) EACH lawyer ...

 

[Novice Seeker]

I had to look at the date of this post, because I thought I had accidently clicked on the date of the last Contempt motion

I have read Judge Perry's motion and I understood it. JB is claming that MC is also confused? WOW! I have 'here we go again' running through my mind right now. I wonder how Judge Perry is going to handle this one?

Hopefully with a discipline that treats laziness, ego, and makes the nose grow when one lies.....



Novice Seeker

 

[Intermezzo]

Prosecutor Wants Baez Held In Contempt Of Court
Casey Anthony Attorney Missed Deadline, State Claims

http://www.wesh.com/caseyanthony/26942307/detail.html

Read State's Motion for Rule To Show Just Cause: http://www.wesh.com/pdf/26942318/detail.html

"We are a bit confused," Baez wrote in the email. "I understood it to mean that if we were objecting to anything not in our motion that it should be in writing. That was also my understanding as to what was discussed at the status hearing. I have also discussed the matter with Mr. Mason and he is just as confused if not more."

Baez now cites Confusion to another missed deadline...

It is becoming very apparent Confusion DOES reign at the Baez Law Firm..oh and Cheney Mason is confused as well...
:twocents:

 

[sumbunny]

"We are a bit confused," Baez wrote in the email. "I understood it to mean that if we were objecting to anything not in our motion that it should be in writing. That was also my understanding as to what was discussed at the status hearing. I have also discussed the matter with Mr. Mason and he is just as confused if not more."

Baez now cites Confusion to another missed deadline...

It is becoming very apparent Confusion DOES reign at the Baez Law Firm..oh and Cheney Mason is confused as well...
:twocents:

BBM
So Baez is saying "CM is dumber then me!!!" Does that make it OK?

Perhaps they should have asked Anne Finell..Bet she knew what HHJBP wanted ~winks~

 

[Tulessa]

We are a bit confused," Baez wrote in the email. "I understood it to mean that if we were objecting to anything not in our motion that it should be in writing. That was also my understanding as to what was discussed at the status hearing. I have also discussed the matter with Mr. Mason and he is just as confused if not more."

How did this man pass the Bar? I'm no dummy, but he takes the cake!!

 

[belle3]

idk????? but it seems that someones chair will be rocking to the stratosphere. lol! hey guys you live in the state of florida, not the state of confusion. get it together!

 

[faefrost]

I had to look at the date of this post, because I thought I had accidently clicked on the date of the last Contempt motion

I have read Judge Perry's motion and I understood it. JB is claming that MC is also confused? WOW! I have 'here we go again' running through my mind right now. I wonder how Judge Perry is going to handle this one?

I'm betting that the state has no real expectations that JB or CM will be held in contempt. Rather this is a major warning shot that they will no longer tolerate any sloppiness in filings, any laziness in failing to generate paperwork or documents, and be absolutely and totally unforgiving when it comes to deadlines going forward. Any paperwork coming from JB that is not on time or is failing in any way will be asked to be struck. Any i's not dotted, t's not crossed will be challenged. The state is no longer playing nice and simple phone calls and e-mails are no longer acceptable. JB's lazy approach of "you guys know what I want, it was in that other motion" will not fly any longer. He is going to be forced to sit down and write out each and every piece of paperwork in order to get ready for his hearings and trial.

of course since this is JB, he's not going to learn a damned thing from this. Expect to see him submit a ton of BS motions in the next day or so demanding that the SA's be sanctioned for any number of perceived offenses. He simply does not take schooling well and tends to respond like a small child.