2011.04.06 Frye Hearing Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
now she is asking him odor signature analysis methodology questions again when he clearly earlier stated he never even worked in this area.. and now asking him about positive controls in this case


objection

hhjp: miisssssss ssssiiiiiiiiimmmmmmmssssss?

DS rephrases and again tries to get logan to slam on Vass' positive controls for his experiment

in other words she is trying to get a specific answer with a general quesiton
 
The sound is awful, I'm not following anything DS is saying, not sure where she's going, and all I want is to hear JA... super bummed :(
 
Dr is sighing very hard and struggling to give the dt the answers they are looking for. He seems like hed rather be anywhere than there.
 
Should I just go back to bed?....cuz this is ridiculous!
 
DS: what about the trunk samples
BL because of what is naturally in the enviornment - it would be important to test from a variety of samples - not just 2 carpet samples - carpets with different degrees of wear, staining, etc.
 
He's claiming that Dr. Vass had no controls to use???

This man has done this for over 20 years, many different stages of decomp and I think Dr. Vass is the expert in this field...knock the procedures when you don't even know or do his work..


Why do they put in hypotheticals....this isn't an experiment trial...is a murder trial...DSimms needs to be replaced...
 
Two samples vs a hundred samples. There was a decomposing child in that trunk.
 
:lol: Close up of JA talking to himself - "WHAT?" And shaking his head in disbelief!
 
witness struggles to answer.

witness: because of the range of materials that are present in decomp and natural materials in environment, that it is important to test different types of carpet: staining, ones that have been outside, older, etc. these should be in the data base.

d.sims: if a train leaving ohio at ten fifteen with seventy five people who think ICA is innocent, what time will this line of questioning be over?

hum? hum....!?
 
absolutely....


It appears this is pointless for Dr. Logan just admitted himself with that answer he is not an expert...why go on???

Lawsuit...DSimms should realize this isn't a medical lawsuit, it's a criminal, premeditated murder trial of a two year old child..Could be, ICA will fire her once this day is over..they don't seem pleased with their own 'expert'...


I don't get this either. At first I thought well it's just to give HHJP info for him to rule properly on frye. But that doesn't really work either b/c he is not an expert! So what the heck is this? HHJP throwing the DT a bone? :waitasec:

MOO
 
Again from Twitter: Court spokeswoman just came in an had the deputy hand Judge Perry a note. Judge Perry read it, nodded her way and she left.
 
:great: Just got a screen shot of JA muttering to himself then he made a yakety yak hand sign followed by a hand down wave as if to say - no way! Pretty amusing!
 
From the glass is half empty perspective:

Isn't the fact that there is no scientific publishing done on this topic mean trouble for the prosecution? I mean, is it a generally accepted science? Does the science even exist in the scientific community outside of Vass's work? Isn't that part of the Frye test?

When DNA was first introduced at trial it faced the same issues. New science will always be faced with this.
 
Me thinks that as Dr. Logan is answering DCSs questions, in the back of his mind, he is dreading the cross by JA. I'd be dreading it too, if I was him.
 
Let me ask you a hypothetical....DCS to BL

The look on the Judges face and JA face.


hypotheticalandjudge.PNG

jahypo.PNG
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
143
Guests online
613
Total visitors
756

Forum statistics

Threads
626,994
Messages
18,536,376
Members
241,163
Latest member
kecalli
Back
Top