2011.04.06 Frye Hearing Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
JB is going a pretty good job, imo. I'm no scientist or lawyer, but it sounds good to me.

Sometime somewhere a lawyer probably said about the same stuff about dna.

wonder if the judge disallows the science, can Voss still testify to his reaction to the smell?

sounds like pretty strong evidence to me. of course, Cindy Anthony, who once actually stated that SHE is a "nurse of decomposition" (she said that) has already testified what she thought it smelled like, a dead body. Course, upon further review, she changed her opinion.

nevertheless, imo, Baez is doing well, and this could go either way, imo.

also, its not gonna matter. nothings gonna matter in the long run. ICA cannot win. shes a walking doorway to hell, imo.

(can I say that?)

With great respect I disagree, while he could have made a few brownie points, when you chose to, as part of a presentation, insult experts, the defense, potential jurors and the judge, reinterpret facts to suit a purpose and can't spell even with spell checker for your presentation...then you haven't done well at all. JMO
 
If this case was not so serious, this could be on Bloopers TV show:maddening: :floorlaugh:
 
I keep flashing back to Ghostbusters while he's yammering on. "Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes! The dead rising from the grave! Human sacrifice! Dogs and cats living together! Mass hysteria!" I'm just waiting for the buzzer. Or gong. Please?
 
Comparing apples to oranges?

Sounds like comparing spilled soda to decomp.

Really?
 
Well, I can calm down with the fact that if THIS is the style of his closing arguments, those jurors are going to so angry they can't see straight and that needle will go into Casey's arm really fast. OMG.
 
I'm trying to imagine what is going on in Joy Wray's brain right this second.
 
Well, I can calm down with the fact that if THIS is the style of his closing arguments, those jurors are going to so angry they can't see straight and that needle will go into Casey's arm really fast. OMG.

No IMHO they will be laughing all the way back to the jury room
 
I fully understand the importance of repetition as a rhetorical device, but IMO, JB is abusing the technique horribly.

Now he wants to address the LIBS findings.

I do believe his goal is to go til 5.

He finds it difficult to restrain himself when making these arguments because this evidence is so preposterous...
 
JB is going a pretty good job, imo. I'm no scientist or lawyer, but it sounds good to me.

Sometime somewhere a lawyer probably said about the same stuff about dna.

wonder if the judge disallows the science, can Voss still testify to his reaction to the smell?

sounds like pretty strong evidence to me. of course, Cindy Anthony, who once actually stated that SHE is a "nurse of decomposition" (she said that) has already testified what she thought it smelled like, a dead body. Course, upon further review, she changed her opinion.

nevertheless, imo, Baez is doing well, and this could go either way, imo.

also, its not gonna matter. nothings gonna matter in the long run. ICA cannot win. shes a walking doorway to hell, imo.

(can I say that?)

BBM

Well yes.

Some other defense attorney said much the same sort of same stuff about DNA while facing Jeff Ashton as the opposing council. JA won that argument back then too. He was the first prosecutor to get DNA evidence in.
:floorlaugh::floorlaugh:
 
"I find it very difficult restraining myself while making these arguments because I think it's nonsense."

Well, you don't do a very good job at restraining yourself and that statement just proves you lack professionalism. Keep talking Baez...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
165
Guests online
635
Total visitors
800

Forum statistics

Threads
627,165
Messages
18,540,008
Members
241,204
Latest member
bhill
Back
Top