HHJP asked JA why they did not try to contact the witness in the NY case (Patrenko?) and he had an answer that I couldn't hear, then HHJP asked JB what their position would be if they did, and JB responded that they wouldn't like it. Then he said they would want a quid pro quo, and HH said that didn't answer his question, if he objected what would the be the basis of their objection.
HHBP - would you object and what would be your basis for objection?
JB - everything he said would be hearsay
HHBP - Mr. Mason wants to talk to you
JA - I don't object to Mr. Mason talking
The sound quality is so poor today, I hope it's gonna be better for the trial.
I can only make out a few words! aaaarhg
Sounds like HHJP is getting pizzed..
Something hypothetical I think - wants to know what JB would do if JA called a certain witness from NY to give evidence. JB would offer an objection - not good enough for HHJP - what would you do?
OK, my sound is now so good, that I can faintly hear the "backround" music for Bejeweled. Whose computer is on in the court and the mic is picking this up?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.