AF: a person had been found guilty and you are deciding between lwop or dp, this is no excuses no defenses pre meditated murder...that is not an automatic death sentince...can you follow that. death is not always appropriate.
yes.
AF: the law has to prove aggravating circumstances, beyond a reasonable doubt. would you hold the state to that burden?
yes.
AF: if you found no agg circumstances are found, then the dp would never be appropriate. Does that make sense?
(I HATE that she asks, "does that make sense?" )
AF: mitagating circumstances are those circumatances that would make a juror think that LWOP would be best and beyond a reasonable doubt does not have to be proven. Does that make sense?
yes.
AF: if a mitigating circumstance would you concider it whether life was better over dp.
yes
AF: a person's charactor or background that might make LWOP the right sentince. okay.
okay.
AF: you have to go with four, it is a weighing process about what you think is important. okay?
okay
AF: everything about you, your common sense...bring to bear...
yes
AF: What I am getting to here...(oh, thank you!) ????? Police man....
a LE was killed and DP was right.
AF: (speaks like she is asleep. I am sorry. her voice is meant to take you into a lull. it just is, and I can't stand it. I give me a time out NOW)
AND: I do not like this POT juror. :no: