2011.06.16 TRIAL Day Twenty (Morning Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
JB going thru all this is only showing just how thorough LE was in their investigations..WHEN all these tests were done NO ONE but KC knew what happened to Caylee..let alone where she was??..In the end, no blood..okay now its diffinative..She was not shot, she was not bludgeoned, she was not a victim of any traumatic injuries...HOWEVER..She died from lack of O2, and it doesnt matter which came first..chloroform, duct tape, plastic bags..Yikes

Bottom line DNA testings were done long before they ever found sweet Caylee's remains to fine that out even tho she was only bones by that time :-(
 
No DNA on KC's cloths....wouldn't one expect there to be DNA from skin cells if she had worn the item and it had not yet been washed? I'm thinking CA washed far more than just ICA's slacks.
 
sln2o5.jpg

nz0wlw.jpg

2qdd3so.jpg
 
Don't forget, State to gets to cross examine and re-cross, if they wish.
 
I don't think he's bringing in this evidence for the blood value but for the discoloration of the shirt's. He will say that cleaning products caused the discoloration as well as the chloroform
.

Oh, I do hope so! Because then the next logical question would be why was Casey compelled to clean her trunk so vigorously?
 
I think if that were true there would have been more hair and evidence in the trunk. I think she was bagged in the trunk - fatty acids seeped out. I don't think she used the shovel to bag her. I think she was going to bury her but changed her mind and then just through her int he woods.

MO of course.


I don't think she uded the shovel to bag her either. I said Casey discovered digging a hole was too much like "work" and she gave up
 
Is juror 6 falling asleep again? Just watched his head bob.
by stevehelling via twitter at 9:30 AM

HAHA I know I am just about falling asleep!
 
No blood or DNA on shovel?

Maybe because it was cleaned? Ya think?
 
Is DNA not present in adipocere?

I don't know the answer to that question MTnest but good question. Also is DNA never found in purging liquid from deceased? No cells ever found within purging liquid? Something I will look up later.
 
If I were the jury, I would feel as if my time is being wasted. They had Weds off, but Thursday when they start, they call Bloise and get nothing. Now with this lady---we already KNOW there was no blood, just fluids. JEBUS HELP ME![/QUOTE]

Jesus help Caylee get her justice on the day that she most likely died. God bless her and those that care.


EXACTLY!!! This is crazy!
 
Is he trying to prove that the stain in the trunk wasn't decomp because it tested negative for blood?

The decomp fluid comes from the inside out...gastrointestinal bacteria....it wouldn't have blood!! The blood is settled in the veins, arteries and capillaries of the body so without a perforation of some sort into the body, why would there be blood???!!

He's an <modsnip>!
 
Why is SA not objecting for relevance?

Has anyone suggested, implied, or claimed this was a bloody death?

::yawn::

I think it is because the entire line of questioning is rediculous! Better to let them dig their own time in hell.
 
Tested shovel for blood?? No blood. Ok.....
 
This line is especially foolish considering the exchange between JB and HHJBP early on, when the judge specifically asked him how anyone would be able to detect a drowning in a pool. At that time, JB brought up the issue of a possible head injury and blood. That may be why he keeps going back to this dry well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
225
Guests online
755
Total visitors
980

Forum statistics

Threads
625,902
Messages
18,513,242
Members
240,877
Latest member
Bellybell23
Back
Top