2011.06.18 TRIAL Day Twenty-two (Morning Session Only)

Status
Not open for further replies.
If JB does this again, could it cause a mistrial? I'm really worried that's what he's going for. With HLN allowing LKB to heavily taint a future jury pool, this wouldn't be good.
 
Schaeffer said JB looking like a scolded school boy. This is upsetting to BS. He wants to see Miss A get a fair trial.
 
I love that this judge doesn't want ICA to pay for something her attorney has done. Whether you believe she is guilty or innocent, she is entitled to a fair trial.

HHJP rocks, imo.

It would be an appeal issue. HHJP knew months ago this is what JB was trying to get away with. That's why he made the court order. He knew this would happen.
 
So this trial has gone from a train wreak to a circus and now a rodeo...wow!
 
Stunning rebuke of Baez. Now puts this critical testimony in jeapordy.
by bobkealing via twitter at 8:53 AM
 
I knew Baez would pull another of his tricks, just didn't expect it so soon.
Well good....when the jury returns to find the witness gone.....they will know something wasn't on the up and up. I'm sure Baez didn't want this result. :loser:
 
Bill Shaefer on WFTV says that JB needs to take this smackdown like a man. Not by stomping around the courtroom!!

Love Bill Shaefer!!
 
If the State asks this guy something NOT in his report, he can opine on the spot because he is an expert witness, yet the defense can't ask him to opine unless the opinion is already in the expert's files??? Motion for mistrial.
 

Still experiencing trouble w/laptop....typed the entire morning and laptop shut down....losing all info....back on the minibook - please excuse typos and transpositons even more today - due to tiny keyboard...Big thanks to Mombomb!


 
I think the excuse of JB's inexperience is overused - CM is right there - he knows better and certainly should be advising JB - but he's as slimy as JB :deadhorse:
 
Could JB's antics be intentional in a desperate attempt at a mistrial?
TIA
 
I really think it's him who the sequestration violation is about. His TV interviews have been outrageous. I've been working my fingers to the bone transcribing them lol.


I don't understand why he's even allowed to testify then???
 
I'm confused. I thought the video was to show the tape "could have" covered the nose and mouth, not that it actually was positioned that way. This is the issue this doctor is supposed to rebut.

Exactly right. And the witness who presented the video said so himself on the stand. The video represented how the duct tape MIGHT have moved during decomp. But Dr. R probably isn't watching all this testimony, so he's probably not aware of that. Again, not his fault if he misspeaks...JB is asking the questions here, and he only contacted Dr. R 2 days ago?
 
I need a sedative, I really need a sedative now..... I am trembling and my face is beet red..................... I loathe him............

No no, no trembling - wrong reaction - stand up and yell Hooray - Finally! In your ear Baez!!!
You will feel so much better - really!!!
 
I really think it's him who the sequestration violation is about. His TV interviews have been outrageous. I've been working my fingers to the bone transcribing them lol.

What are the consequences if he is found guilty of the rule of sequestration for giving interviews about the case?

Does anyone know?
 
I'm so pleased that JB is embarrassed, but that the judge is protecting CA. We do not want JB's malpractice to infect this trial. I loved JB's body language when he walked back to the defense table. He was stomping like a teenager!!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
388
Total visitors
510

Forum statistics

Threads
625,817
Messages
18,510,809
Members
240,850
Latest member
Ethica187
Back
Top