2011.06.22 TRIAL Day Twenty-five (Morning Session)

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #941
  • #942
twitter

Well that explains a lot. Trunk liner and spare tire cover were REMOVED four days before Sigman took his air samples.
 
  • #943
So, the defense called an expert to testify about what they termed "junk science" to bolster their case?
 
  • #944
I wonder if JA is a chemist!! He is certainly very knowledgeable about all of these scientific and forensic issues.
 
  • #945
Not sure who I am crushing on more right now Yuri or Jeff:beats: shh don't tell hubby.
 
  • #946
Bill Schaeffer does not think Juror 4 will cause a hung jury. She might cause a lesser included but not a hung jury.

But even that upsets me. If it's lesser than 1st degree murder that means ICA could get out in as little as 13 years for killing Caylee. She would still be within child bearing years.

I would just feel better if she wasn't even on the jury period. I think it was the biggest mistake that HHJP has made and might allow ICA to be free one day.
 
  • #947
  • #948
The GOOD machine that he doesn't have is a better method for low levels of compounds.
 
  • #949
  • #950
Sneaking in for a sec while "working" to say: I LOVE YOU PEOPLE! You keep me informed and ROFL all day!! Thank YOU!!! :)
 
  • #951
MagpieFromHinky Pamela



Ashton (smells good too) is up for the cross of Sigman. He's asking if Sigman stuck a syringe in trunk & pulled air sample

Aw, don't tell me he even SMELLS good....I can't afford another stalking charge.
 
  • #952
  • #953
MagpieFromHinky Pamela



Ashton (smells good too) is up for the cross of Sigman. He's asking if Sigman stuck a syringe in trunk & pulled air sample

So he smells dreamy too? Arghhhhhhhhhhhhh :blush:
 
  • #954
I bet he ends his cross asking about the "smell" in the trunk. IMO, MOO
 
  • #955
Nancy Grace took Steve Helling to task last night on that article. It really was quite funny.

Wait a minute - NG was taking someone to task for being sensationalist?? :floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:
 
  • #956
I also disagree with the Juror 4 hype. Just because someone "wont judge someone" doesn't mean they think every single person walking the earth is innocent and perfect.

Or she just used that as an excuse to not be on this jury but it didn't work...I hope juror #4 will not cause a ruckus as being the lone holdout..Hoping #4 will do right for Caylee Marie and find justice for this precious child...
 
  • #957
  • #958
  • #959
FBI Quarterback chemist? That's quite a combo. So two more forensic experts today possible?

I agree they need to move on. I know they are trying to disprove the SA experts but they doing so badly at it and there is NO narrative here. When the SA was up they had were creating a somewhat linear timeline. I could follow it. This just seems like "well all the silly science and junk scientists are wrrrrrrooonnng and that guy is NOT A CHEMIST".

I may be expecting to much to think we should get a somewhat clear narrative. Even if it is complete caca, JB needs to weave that and not just in his opening statement. Stop calling experts that make you look like an idiot. Call GA...calll LA. Call Casey if you are going there. Call anyone who legitimately can support the crazy abuse = covered up an accidental death and not some guy you pick out of the phone book.
 
  • #960
I wonder if JA is a chemist!! He is certainly very knowledgeable about all of these scientific and forensic issues.

He may or may not have a science background. JB's opinion aside, one can become very erudite just by reading and thinking. He could have learned a lot in preparation for this case, by being smart!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
92
Guests online
1,272
Total visitors
1,364

Forum statistics

Threads
632,427
Messages
18,626,387
Members
243,149
Latest member
Pgc123
Back
Top