Kentjbkent
DELETE ACCOUNT
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2009
- Messages
- 3,815
- Reaction score
- -22
We need you LDB!
Don't worry....LDB is very well versed with Joe Jordan and she will make Mason look ridiculous here....
We need you LDB!
Last night on NG I saw a very animated and angry ICA. Did that occur yesterday?
Wasnt the theory even discussed here ? I seem to remembr alot of members being aware of all the searchers and wondering how it was missed.
Really it doesnt make much since that in the first days of the searches before the area was under water in Aug, that she was so close to being found but not. Given a red bag would have had stood out.
Witness sent email to Allen and Melich, stating that he believed he was in the location where her remains were located, with cadaver dogs he believed to be qualified. Witness told Melich and Allen that he believed the remains were moved.
Wondering if she threatened to hurt a member of her DT...wonder if that's what prompted her psych eval's over the weekend.
I can't help but think this witness will also turn into a state's witness!
:great:
More background for you "newbies" to case...
Defense read posts on WS and contacted Joe Jordan wanting him to come in for interview. We never learned details of WHY...because they were sealed...but Joe Jordan got suspicious of defense (think he assumed they were going to try to get him to agree to their theory?) so Joe Jordan RECORDED the meeting with defense without their knowledge and then took recording to LE.....
Turned into huge issue....LE heard recording but SA never did since it was illegal, but it resulted in a hearing in front of judge...
THread in this forum about it.....but basically, defense is going to try to use Joe Jordan to implicate TES and Tim Miller...
This is my recollection....others please chime in to details I may be "off" on...
Don't worry....LDB is very well versed with Joe Jordan and she will make Mason look ridiculous here....
Not really sure but probably just a precaution, the trial is close to the end now, tensions are high and maybe they are concerned about ICA's upcoming reactions.....:twocents:
Better safe than sorry![]()
Why does he refer to the fence as a "privacy fence" as opposed to a fence? Is that a Southern saying?
I can't help but think this witness will also turn into a state's witness!
:great: