And it’s the way it was brought up that bugs me personally, the P knew they hadn’t given it to the D and yet they intentionally mentioned it, which is not ok and can’t be unheard or undone-
I wish the whole investigation and case pretrial had been better and obvious that due process had been followed to a tee- but lost leads sheets, cleared leads, lost interviews, the appearance of bias, the severity of the pretrial conditions, the judge’s possible bias, etc whether intentional or not- real or imagined- could create doubt as to the integrity of the investigation and the trial -
And this has nothing to do with if I think RA is guilty or not- or how I explain certain evidence or not- and everything to do with due process and innocent until proven guilty BARD- it would be concerning to me as a juror- moo