Understand what you are saying but I highly doubt a van was not mentioned in discovery, and if it wasn’t in discovery the question would then be why? If they’ve had Brad webers testimony about arriving in his van since 2017 it should have been turned over to the defense, unless of course it was recently discovered….
It will hurt the defendant in the long run. The jurors will see through such a ridiculous claim, and it will perhaps show guilt?
What’s a horse cult?
IMO, what if that discovery doesn't mention a vehicle type or colour?
No, that was yesterday's stream, starts around 3:30:00. Says how the witness "could have been out of Deliverance" and laughs about how she's seen a lot of meth mouth and he totally has meth mouth.
Definitely a possibility
Tox screen was mentioned as being done during the autopsy but in passing. I think if they'd found something we'd know about it, all MOO
My thinking is they don't need to name a specific person as SODI just cast the thought that others had the opportunity. Prosecution has already done the job for defense of not tying RA to the crime through DNa and bullet testing and the admittance of the actual video and set the stage by their own witnesses that the confessions could have occurred because of RA's psychosis.
I posted this link earlier today on the "White Van". Indy Star (MSM) reports it was "white van" used in Dr. Wala's report. Would her report be part of the evidence that is able to be viewed by the media (MSM) post session?
The large headline below is theirs, not mine.
Scroll down:
Defense calls first 2 witnesses after state rests its case in Delphi murders trial
It's been two years since multiple law enforcement agencies announced Richard Allen's arrest in the Delphi killings. His trial continues Thursday.www.indystar.com
www.wishtv.com
drive.google.com
drive.google.com
My thought is it will be which side puts together the best time line that is clear for the jury. If anything this case has been very confusing because everything relies on date and time and without the ability to access everything almost impossible to put together. The crime, who all was where when, the onset of psychosis, the confessions....my thought is prosecutions tactic was to not focus on a timeline to blur any inconsistencies. Defense's might be the emphasize a timeline if they have conflicting time evidence. I'm one of the small minority who chooses "don't know" everyday in the survey LOL. I need to hear the defense case to get off the proverbial fence. My hope is Angela's appeal to the Supreme Court in Indiana prevails and quickly so we can have all the facts of the trial in front of us that the jury will be aware of.
If one was done, for some reason, it wasn’t mentioned by the state. So if it was done, it may not have offered any insight into the case but I still would have liked to have known it was at least done. Mooo. Other things were also curiously not mentioned by the state: eg: stomach contents. Why not? Is it usual to not include this information in a trial? This is not moo, these are questions.
What the heck. He "doesn't" remember despite looking at his report. What is going on here. Again the snippets make me crazy.10:35 A.M: COURT IS IN SESSION FOR FRIDAY.
At 9:01 a.m. the jury entered the courtroom and court is back in session. Judge gull tells defense attorney Brad Rozzi that they will chat about his motions he’s filed on transports during the lunch break.
Gull says the jury has once again had supervised contact with their electronic devices.
The defense calls Christopher Gootee and the state immediately calls for a sidebar. The sidebar lasts 9 minutes.
Gootee tells the jury he is a Hammond, Ind. police officer and has background as an EMT. He says he has training in interviewing witnesses and suspects.
Defense attorney Jennifer Auger asks him about the importance of correctly documenting interviews. Gootee says he was with an FBI gang response task force or GRIT. They focused on kidnappings.
Gootee tells the jury that GRIT assisted with the Delphi investigation by canvassing neighborhoods and conducting interviews. He says he worked on the investigation for over a week.
Gootee says he spoke to Brad Weber during the investigation. Auger asks Gootee what Weber said about where he went after work on February 13, 2017.
Auger asks Gootee what an FBI 302 is, Gootee says it is a report from an interview. Auger shows him an exhibit, which is an FBI 302 report from his interview with Weber.
Gootee says he spoke to Weber on Feb. 19, 2017. He tells the jury that he doesn’t know what Weber said, despite looking at his own report. Auger finishes her questions, the state does not cross-examine.
Delphi Murders trial: Day 13 live blog
Delphi Murders trial of Richard Allen continues with testimony from witnesses. Allen is charged with murder of two girls in 2017. Follow for updates.
Such a small detail for them to have slipped in. It’s easy to see how people may wrongfully attribute it to RA as part of his “confessions”. Mooo.
Or RA was psyhotic and we can't believe in the confessions or he was lucid and had time enough to read the huge discovery, found a minor detail (that isn't even in the discovery according to the witness but ok..) and gave a perfect confession and corrected the timeline making all pieces of the crime fit and made perfect sense - a perfect piece that only the killer would know. The D can't have the both ways IMO.
I think if someone did that now, and found a bullet there at all, it would be too late to try to get it admitted into evidence etc. moo. But you made me wonder, what sort of investigation was conducted if any at the bridge or along the supposed route to the crime scene specific to metal? Eg; did they use metal detectors along the supposed route to try to find any other bullets or metal that may have been used? If not, why not? Moooooo.
