- Joined
- Jun 3, 2004
- Messages
- 28,753
- Reaction score
- 44,526
Yes to me she's being weasly, claiming that she doesn't remember when it suits her, like when it's damning.yes she is being very crafty in her answers...
Yes to me she's being weasly, claiming that she doesn't remember when it suits her, like when it's damning.yes she is being very crafty in her answers...
Yes, not disagreeing that it was her decision. But I am super confident that it was on her team's recommendation to do that.
Deceptive memory.Selective memory...
Oh, we're interested. The court probably has no idea that this trial is being followed around the world.Erin said.. Erin responds that "nobody was interested in what I did months and years ago" during those conversations, and that everything was all centred specifically on the meal.
She is starting to feel the pressure..! This is what Dr Rogers wants to see
Why's that? Literally no defence ever recommends this.
I think she's toast with her admission of having foraged.It is highly doubtful that they recommended that she testified. That would more than likely been her decision, in which case they would have told her that she is going to need to fess up to a lot of the lies if she is to have a shot at appearing credible, which, IMO, she has no chance at.
And yet many suspects do testify against the advice of their lawyers. It's purely the defendant's decision. So their lawyer has to work with the strategy the client is good with.Well, for one, it would be pretty silly to go against the advice of your extremely experienced team....who are on your side.
But apart from that, I just think it's clearly obvious its part of their strategy. It's not the norm but it's not unheard of.
She is now dictating to Dr Rogers what she should only be saying. LolOh, we're interested. The court probably has no idea that this trial is being followed around the world.
Yes and stuffing yourself with cake, coffee, chili, hotdogs isn't going to feel the same either.I think she had never experienced a true episode of food poisoning of any sort and so believed from her internet research that the symptoms would appear as bad gastro.
Trust me, once you've experienced food poisoning yourself you will never make this mistake. Once you know, you know. OH BOY do you know...!
Erin said.. Erin responds that "nobody was interested in what I did months and years ago" during those conversations, and that everything was all centred specifically on the meal.
She is starting to feel the pressure..! This is what Dr Rogers wants to see
I do too.Of course the medical team would have been keen to learn that she went foraging months ago and then dehydrated the mushrooms and stored them in her pantry. But since they didn't specifically ask if she had dehydrated mushrooms in her pantry then she's claiming she was truthful with them.
IMO, she thinks being really cunning with her "rules-lawyering". But I think the jury will more likely see her evasiveness as outright deceit.
It occurs to me that the real reason to dehydrate the Death Caps is to hide them (Shrink them in size, pulverize them into powder). Still get the toxins, but not visible. Someone here just said that she tried to commit the perfect murder. Only the experts figured out that the toxins were Death Caps- not her lame excuse that the mushrooms were from Woolworth's and a mystery Asian grocer.I do too.
I think someone mentioned in a previous thread, she may have been better off to not have mushrooms in the dish and just have the powder.. so when asked what they ate, eg we had shepherds pie / lasagna / etc then it wouldn't have rung any alarm bells. But I don't think she realised how fast the drs would identify the possible source of their illness when they heard mushrooms.It occurs to me that the real reason to dehydrate the Death Caps is to hide them (Shrink them in size, pulverize them into powder). Still get the toxins, but not visible. Someone here just said that she tried to commit the perfect murder. Only the experts figured out that the toxins were Death Caps- not her lame excuse that the mushrooms were from Woolworth's and a mystery Asian grocer.
I don’t think continually answering “I don’t know or I don’t remember” makes her a good witness. IMOErin seems to be handling the cross-examination well so far, I my opinion.
She has obviously been well tutored by her team on how to answer the questions. I'm sure they'd be happy with their decision to recommend she take the stand and testify (my speculation only).
Just my opinion and observations.
Quoting myself to further explain better- it would have been less suspicious if even she'd given one of the guests the odd-colored/sized plate and given herself a grey one. Instead, all of her guests- who all got violently ill from Death Caps in her meal had the same plates, while she who only had minor gastro symptoms- seemingly cured by Imodium and Ginger Tea had a different plate. That's highly suspicious and suggests color-coding to me so that she knew who had the poisoned portions.The point is that Heather noticed that the guests plates- be they light grey or whatever color were noticeably different in color/pattern from Erin's and probably not for any innocent reason. Why not use the more distinctive and memorable black & white ones?