literally their job.As for informal statements that hold no merit or credibility, they’re informal for those reasons and It’s unreasonable to expect police to waste time and resources door-
That’s a bold claim—to suggest the coroner was disinterested in Detective Laidlaw’s brief of evidence. I find it hard to believe that any coroner would disregard or dismiss a lead detective’s statement, even if parts of it are based on professional opinion. A redacted statement, especially in the context of a coroner’s inquiry, doesn’t automatically lose its value. It can still be considered relevant and potentially significant in an ongoing investigation.
GJ released this statement today ….What’s GJ’s take on all of this,
GJ released this statement today ….
Same can be said for the 2 detectives before him.Not the statement as such (I’m sure there were dozens, if not hundreds of written only submissions), but the coroner’s court actually making a change of schedule and (pointedly) stating why they weren’t interested in having him on the stand.
Unusual - and not a vote of confidence.
thanks SlouthGJ released this statement today ….