- Joined
- Sep 16, 2021
- Messages
- 51
- Reaction score
- 382
I believe the jury's initial instructions were clear. They tried to reach a unanimous decision on count 1, and were unsuccessful in doing so. The instructions then were to stop deliberating, they were finished. There was no instruction for splitting the baby and to now only consider Count 2...
I believe if Count 1 failed, they were always going to have to consider Count 2. The instruction to the jury is framed as 'you must reach a verdict on Count 1 and otherwise cannot consider Count 2' because obviously the judge doesn't want to suggest to the jury that they could be a hung jury. But a hung jury is always a possibility, or a charge being dropped. And IF they are a hung jury or a charge is dropped, in reality...they're going to have to consider Count 2, cause that's how it works. Count 2 doesn't magically disappear.
I don't think we're going to agree on this, but hopefully my view here is clear. In any event, it may all be a moot point, and if not, there's an appeal.
Last edited: