Germany/Portugal - Christian Brueckner, 27 @ time of 1st crime (2004), charged with sexual assault crimes, Praia de Rocha, Portugal. #2

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #221
FWIW the Mail says the other lawyers are specialists so perhaps one of them is the second on the trial and the others are more defence experts
 
  • #222
Trial postponed, due to an unsuitable lay judge.

Fair enough, people like her doesn't fit sitting at the judges bench!
 
  • #223
The question of funding came up when Jon Clarke interviewed HCW. Jon wrote about it in his book. HCW told Jon about how (in part) FF was being funded, but HCW asked Jon not to write about it.

If this is the case I am sure at some point the public will have more info. If it’s come from where I suspect it may have, then it’ll add to the inevitable negative scrutiny attached to some elements of the MM case as a whole. Jmo
The only reason JC the journalist is interested is because he thinks there a story to be had.
 
  • #224
Trial postponed, due to an unsuitable lay judge.

Fair enough, people like her doesn't fit sitting at the judges bench!
Is it a defence challenge?
 
  • #225
Trial postponed, due to an unsuitable lay judge.

Fair enough, people like her doesn't fit sitting at the judges bench!
Agree. FF will likely play technicalities the whole way through. The only part I think he’ll really struggle with is fighting the evidence.
 
  • #226
  • #227
The only reason JC the journalist is interested is because he thinks there a story to be had.
I think that’s the whole nature of journalism as a profession.
That doesn’t mean HCW didn’t mention that when he was interviewed by JC.
 
  • #228
I think that’s the whole nature of journalism as a profession.
That doesn’t mean HCW didn’t mention that when he was interviewed by HCW.
HCW replied to a question, JC likes his exclusives.
 
  • #229
Agree. FF will likely play technicalities the whole way through. The only part I think he’ll really struggle with is fighting the evidence.
Playing for time by FF isn't that kind of surprising to me!

So then let the games begin on next friday! No big deal so far.
 
  • #230
  • #231
Agree. FF will likely play technicalities the whole way through. The only part I think he’ll really struggle with is fighting the evidence.
We only know of that which is public, I'd venture there is lots to emerge that's not known and will have far more of a bearing on proceedings.
 
  • #232
HCW replied to a question, JC likes his exclusives.
Same point applies.

It’ll be interesting to know whether the increased media exposure of CB, will pull out more witnesses. He has very distinct pockedmarked/pitted-skin which hasn’t been as visible in other pictures. Certainly a very notable feature that people would remember.
 
  • #233
Getting the lay judge removed for crazy SM posts isn't a technicality. This is the person who would literally help decide on a man's guilt or innocence.
 
Last edited:
  • #234
Playing for time by FF isn't that kind of surprising to me!

So then let the games begin on next friday! No big deal so far.

I don't think they are playing for time. They just don't want a crazy person on the bench. It would be malpractice to allow that to slide
 
  • #235
I don't think they are playing for time. They just don't want a crazy person on the bench. It would be malpractice to allow that to slide
That’s a fair point MrJitty & it is right they find a new lay judge. FF has delayed the inevitable via the failed technicalities pre-trial. But the prosecution did deliver it to the courtroom. I agree with super dad that aside from arguing the evidence, this trial will be fraught with technicalities & very stop-start.
 
  • #236
Getting the lay judge removed for crazy SM posts isn't a technicality. This is the person who would literally help decide on a man's guilt or innocence.
Who vetted the judge in the first place?
 
  • #237
Agree. FF will likely play technicalities the whole way through. The only part I think he’ll really struggle with is fighting the evidence.
Would you consider it prosecution failures if CB was found ng on any of the charges?
 
  • #238
Would you consider it prosecution failures if CB was found ng on any of the charges?
Difficult hypothetical without the context of why not guilty verdicts may be. As admin have said before, not being found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt doesn’t mean innocent & that’s the worry for any prosecutor. Having evidence but not delivering a verdict would feel like justice wasn’t done & they’d failed in that regard.
 
  • #239
Sky News have just reported it's still being assessed whether to throw out judge or not .. adjourned for a week to make this decision .
 
  • #240
Difficult hypothetical without the context of why not guilty verdicts may be. As admin have said before, not being found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt doesn’t mean innocent & that’s the worry for any prosecutor. Having evidence but not delivering a verdict would feel like justice wasn’t done & they’d failed in that regard.
Evidence can also be wrong, otherwise we wouldn't see cases of miscarriage of justice.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
70
Guests online
3,208
Total visitors
3,278

Forum statistics

Threads
632,659
Messages
18,629,793
Members
243,238
Latest member
talu
Back
Top