- Joined
- Dec 28, 2021
- Messages
- 4,450
- Reaction score
- 13,611
So if the prosecution are successful in removing the judges because of of bias, what's to prevent the defence in doing the same halfway through another trial, sauce for the goose.
It would have been.The argument goes that the judges haven't seen all the evidence, wasn't this presented pre trial?
Actually I don't accept that argument. If there is insufficient evidence to charge, the case should be reclassified as a cold case and investigators move on the other cases, of which there will be more than enough to keep them in employment.Personally, it does indeed seem like there isn't enough evidence. Even though we know better...
But now they may be forced to charge him in the Maddie case.
They've spent years procrastinating and looking for evidence, trying to gain even more time, and as long as CB is in custody, well, you're not in such a hurry.
It's time for the evidence in the Maddie case to come to light
Wolters has said they have enough to charge bit want to charge with the best possible evidence.Actually I don't accept that argument. If there is insufficient evidence to charge, the case should be reclassified as a cold case and investigators move on the other cases, of which there will be more than enough to keep them in employment.
That was said several years ago and he has never followed through.Wolters has said they have enough to charge bit want to charge with the best possible evidence.
His hand may be forced unless the present trial is stopped
Well the current trial if its a bellweather for the MM case is lacking imo.Wolters has said they have enough to charge bit want to charge with the best possible evidence.
His hand may be forced unless the present trial is stopped
Bit presumptious if I might say, we're not in court listening to that which is presented.Personally, it does indeed seem like there isn't enough evidence. Even though we know better...
But now they may be forced to charge him in the Maddie case.
They've spent years procrastinating and looking for evidence, trying to gain even more time, and as long as CB is in custody, well, you're not in such a hurry.
It's time for the evidence in the Maddie case to come to light
CB has already been indicted for five serious sexual offences which have not as yet been settled in a court of law so what would be the purpose in adding yet another to the count.Personally, it does indeed seem like there isn't enough evidence. Even though we know better...
But now they may be forced to charge him in the Maddie case.
They've spent years procrastinating and looking for evidence, trying to gain even more time, and as long as CB is in custody, well, you're not in such a hurry.
It's time for the evidence in the Maddie case to come to light
Neither are we and the information coming from within the court is so disjointed as to be next to impossible to follow with much meaning despite Niner keeping us up to date on proceedings.Bit presumptious if I might say, we're not in court listening to that which is presented.
Neither are we and the information coming from within the court is so disjointed as to be next to impossible to follow with much meaning despite Niner keeping us up to date on proceedings.
My opinion
Yes, enjoy an holiday away from this, although no doubt some article will appear linking CB to some unsolved missing child.Next I have trial on August 5th.
It seems the eye expert confirmed that HB would be able to recognise CB by his eyesAnd I am having a hard time keeping up with what is REALLY going on... Like someone said above - we are not in the court room - so much of what is going on is not in the articles unfortunately.
Like for yesterday - any articles on the 2 witnesses - from Finland? - for Hazel's case - their names & the eye expert was on yesterday from what I have read that has been posted here.
If anyone has more on the ladies & eye expert - TIA
Next I have trial on August 5th.
It seems the eye expert confirmed that HB would be able to recognise CB by his eyes
RespectfullyI suppose it would depend upon her cognitive ability after nearly 20 years.
The test would be to present her with images of a couple of dozen sets of blue eyes to see if she could identify CB. Rather like looking at a book of mugshots.
^ I wonder what that means? Who are these failed people? What does 'new appointments' mean? Is it referring to those yet to give evidence?Paywall but editorial opinion.
![]()
Prozess gegen Maddie-Verdächtigen - Attacke der Anklägerinnen
Christian B.: Die Braunschweiger Staatsanwältinnen greifen zur schärfsten Waffe: Sie stellen einen Befangenheitsantrag gegen die drei Richter. Gekämpft wird um die öffentliche Meinung, vorgebaut wird für die Revision.www.braunschweiger-zeitung.de
A public prosecutor's application for a court is rare, and it is even rarer. The chances of success are likely to be slim. The board has not indicated that it wants to put an end to it prematurely. Instead, new appointments have been made for failed people, witnesses and experts will continue to be heard.
That's how I take it, one of the judges was ill, making dates for the dates lost because of that.^ I wonder what that means? Who are these failed people? What does 'new appointments' mean? Is it referring to those yet to give evidence?
That's how I take it, one of the judges was ill, making dates for the dates lost because of that.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.