I don't think she had her kids when she went to his door. I could be wrong but it seems she lost the kids and then went to the door.
I agree. She lost her precious boys while she was hanging on to the tree root, near her abandoned vehicle.
She didn't have her kids with her while she was throwing a pot into the back of the home to try to get someone to come out and help her find her boys that had washed away in the







. That much is not disputed. She apparently knocked on other doors, and found them either empty or the residents refused to come out and help her, which is what she asked for.
For her to go to the front door of this man's home, ask to be let in with her boys, and then go BACK to the much more dangerous area of the downed tree, have her kids swept away, and then go BACK to the house that had refused her entry and throw a pot through the back of the home asking for the man (who had already denied her shelter) to come out into the raging storm to help her recover her swept away children defies logic.
It seems clear to me. She struggled to get to the home and in the process her children were swept away while she tried to anchor herself and kids to the tree. Then, when the kids swept away she ran into the neighborhood to try to get people to come help her in the storm to recover her children, and no one would come out to the storm, and then she spent the night on an abandoned porch near the man's house.
Which is what most of the articles, and her sister, say she did. I've only seen the Anderson Cooper story say the man denied her shelter when she approached him with the kids.
It just doesn't add up that way. IMHO.