Gardenista
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2016
- Messages
- 19,034
- Reaction score
- 157,598
he did not agree with attorneys representing media organizations including The Associated Press that there is an emergency that requires him to make an immediate ruling
I am confused, didn't Foxx have this to say about the sealing of the records just a few days back?
In an interview with Chicago's ABC affiliate Wednesday night, Foxx claimed that the Cook County Prosecutor's Office did not persuade a judge to seal the "Empire" star's records, and that the court file was sealed "inadvertently" and was in the process of being unsealed.
Craig Wall ABC 7 on Twitter
How very odd that it is now so difficult to undo an inadvertent seal.
Does anyone else smell that?
Goes along with the 180 about the recusal.
"Cook County (Ill.) State’s Attorney Kim Foxx did not “formally” recuse herself from the Jussie Smollett case, her office said in a statement Thursday, explaining that Foxx used the term "recuse" in a "colloquial" sense rather than a legal sense when she left the case in February."
State's attorney did not 'formally' recuse herself in Jussie Smollett case, her office says | Fox News
Lyrics to sing along....
Dizzy
I'm so dizzy, my head is spinning
Like a whirlpool, it never ends
And it's you, girl, making it spin
You're making me dizzy....
I am confused, didn't Foxx have this to say about the sealing of the records just a few days back?
In an interview with Chicago's ABC affiliate Wednesday night, Foxx claimed that the Cook County Prosecutor's Office did not persuade a judge to seal the "Empire" star's records, and that the court file was sealed "inadvertently" and was in the process of being unsealed.
Craig Wall ABC 7 on Twitter
How very odd that it is now so difficult to undo an inadvertent seal.
Does anyone else smell that?
Yeah, I wondered that a few days ago "aloud" (i.e., on thread). Does Attorney Foxx not know the rules and process for unsealing a file? (Would we be surprised to learn this?) . Did a reporter do a colloquial summation of her actual words and get it wrong? Does "the process" always take weeks? So many questions...
Foxx's zeal for unsealing those records seems to be about the same zeal as OJ catching the real killers. Maybe she'll come out with a book called If I Sealed It.
Under Illinois law, defendants whose charges are dropped can in certain circumstances have their records sealed immediately. But such a sealing is not mandatory — and was not meant to apply in a high-profile case such as Smollett’s, the media attorneys argued in paperwork filed Monday.
“Sealing records cannot serve its intended purpose here, since, unlike the typical case contemplated by the Act, the public at large is already well aware of the charges brought against Mr. Smollett,” the filing said.
The filing went on to note that the quick sealing left considerable confusion, particularly about what exactly was supposed to have been sealed.
Foxx told multiple reporters last week that she believed only parts of Smollett’s court records should have been kept from public view and that she believed the actual court file would be unsealed.
A spokeswoman for her office walked that back the next day, saying the entire case file was sealed by court order.
Very interesting. Can’t wait to hear about the hearing.CWB Chicago: Lightfoot: Smollett should "be held accountable"; Foxx owes public "more information"
Lightfoot: Smollett should "be held accountable"; Foxx owes public "more information"
Fresh off her victory to become Chicago’s next mayor, Lori Lightfoot on Wednesday again said the public deserves a better explanation of how the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office resolved the Jussie Smollett case. Lightfoot went on to say that the public had seen “a very compelling case” that Smollett “staged a hoax.”
“He’s got to be held accountable,” said Lightfoot, the first openly gay person and the first black woman to be elected mayor in the city, in an interview on MSNBC.
The state’s attorney’s office, headed by Kim Fox, “has to give a much more fulsome explanation. We cannot create the perception that if you’re rich or famous or both that you got one set of justice and for everybody else, it’s something much harsher. That won’t do, and we need to make sure that we have a criminal justice system that has integrity.”
“The state’s attorney’s office has to provide more information about the rationale for the decision to drop the charges,” Lightfoot continued.
Turning to the alleged hate crime itself, the former federal prosecutor pointed to the publicly-available evidence: “I saw…a very compelling case, with videotapes, witness statements, and other information that looked like he had staged a hoax. And if that happens, he’s got to be held accountable.”
Meanwhile, CWBChicago sources have said that another “emergency hearing” in the Smollett matter is scheduled for Thursday. Details regarding the subject matter and who requested the hearing were not immediately available
Here I was hoping I could go back to sleep, now here you are cracking me up, LOL!Foxx's zeal for unsealing those records seems to be about the same zeal as OJ catching the real killers. Maybe she'll come out with a book called If I Sealed It.
There seems to be very little truth coming out of the State's Attorney's Office on this case.Goes along with the 180 about the recusal.
"Cook County (Ill.) State’s Attorney Kim Foxx did not “formally” recuse herself from the Jussie Smollett case, her office said in a statement Thursday, explaining that Foxx used the term "recuse" in a "colloquial" sense rather than a legal sense when she left the case in February."
State's attorney did not 'formally' recuse herself in Jussie Smollett case, her office says | Fox News
Lyrics to sing along....
Dizzy
I'm so dizzy, my head is spinning
Like a whirlpool, it never ends
And it's you, girl, making it spin
You're making me dizzy....