Dont forget the arm and the tiny knee bruise. Plus he cant fly.
Definitely. Which the CW darn well knows, but they’ll try anything, as we’ve seen!
MP is on both witness lists, so that appears to be a yes.
I am wondering this - when MP testified last year, he was still a state trooper- I don’t think he had even been suspended. Now of course, he’s a civilian and perhaps a disgruntled ex employee. Will his loyalties still be with the CW? Or maybe now, to get a little payback against his ex employer, he’ll say whatever comes to mind, even if it sinks the prosecution. I’d break out the popcorn for that show.
See the BH videos. That was an hour after JOK was supposedly hit and there’s barely a coating on the ground. You can see the entire tire on the cars. So I don’t think there was very much to slip on IMO.
If he admits to planting evidence, I think he could still be charged, maybe obstruction of justice or another charge I can think of right now. So I think he’ll stick to the party line.
Tdoc, true, he will have to stick to the party line, few reasons, one would be that he needs connections in a practical sense, for a job. There are those that def support him and for the wrong reasons. He has no integrity either so there you go.. IMO
Agreed, but, if his testimony is completely different from last time, wouldn't that open him up to perjury charges?
Just had a thought, after I watched one of Karen's interviews.
I believe MP plans to appeal his trial board conviction, so I imagine he will be on his best behavior. But I think he will impeach himself because he won't be able to keep his lies straight.
This is what I think happened although I don’t know which door. There are 3 doors. One on the far left has steps, another is around the corner and the third is by the garage.
In an interview with Karen, she said that right away MP had claimed Karen deleted ring security at Meadows. But, now it has come out Karen did not have access, BUT it was he that had access....so covering his behind to set the stage...to pin it on the girl.
Yow!!!! I had never read this before. If this is a real death certificate then it is a real o.m.g!
First what a disturbing thing to put on a death certificate.
Second, well....when someone is asked, "What happened?" and goes on to explain what didn't happen, we better pay attention.
Back in high-school I took a class that I've never forgotten. Like yestetday, I remember the teacher saying "Any language including a negative (not, isn't, don't, doesn't, wasn't, won't, can't, never, etc.) is immediately elevated in importance above that which is in the positive." Meaning, expect the opposite of what their saying to be the actual truth.
Now look at @TIGER0822 sentence again: A Death certificate lists causes of death, never what did not cause the death. The preliminary one stated something like the 'death was not caused by a fight'!
Yow!!!! I had never read this before. If this is a real death certificate then it is a real o.m.g!
First what a disturbing thing to put on a death certificate.
Second, well....when someone is asked, "What happened?" and goes on to explain what didn't happen, we better pay attention.
Back in high-school I took a class that I've never forgotten. Like yestetday, I remember the teacher saying "Any language including a negative (not, isn't, don't, doesn't, wasn't, won't, can't, never, etc.) is immediately elevated in importance above that which is in the positive." Meaning, expect the opposite of what their saying to be the actual truth.
Now look at @TIGER0822 sentence again: A Death certificate lists causes of death, never what did not cause the death. The preliminary one stated something like the 'death was not caused by a fight'!
Reason I think it was front door, was that the light was on and he had never been to the house.
Dighton, MA
