• #2,241
I find it a bit ironic that the same reasoning that says church members should sue protestors and the DOJ should prosecute them, could also say that temple members in Jesus's day should sue him for overturning the temple tables and chairs, and that the Romans should prosecute him for it.

MOO
 
  • #2,242
  • #2,243
I find it a bit ironic that the same reasoning that says church members should sue protestors and the DOJ should prosecute them, could also say that temple members in Jesus's day should sue him for overturning the temple tables and chairs, and that the Romans should prosecute him for it.

MOO
I think maybe you misunderstand the story of Jesus in the Temple and particularly WHY he overturned the tables and ran off the venders. I think in this case, had Jesus been present, he likewise would have run off the protesters in the same manner. But I don't think it the place for a religious discussion.
 
  • #2,244
Here is Ann Doucette's complaint. She filed it herself.

Complaint for Damages
She should have gotten a lawyer.

It reads like it's attempting to show criminal intent by emphasizing the alleged preplanning and the alleged satisfaction on Don Lemon's face.

The only civil expense she specified was legal fees. (And she filed herself, lol.) I imagine only a very bored lawyer or one very philosophically opposed to free speech will take this case, because the are not taking this case for the money.

I was thinking she might at least be the person who broke her arm, but I would think if that parishioner (if they are real) would have the civil lawsuit problem of the suit morphing to being against their own church.

Where are her expenses?

In my opinion, she just wanted to attempt to bolster the criminal charges.

MOO
 
Last edited:
  • #2,245
Here is Ann Doucette's complaint. She filed it herself.

Complaint for Damages
The Defendants will move to dismiss since the jurisdictional requirements are not met for federal court. The Court will give her a chance to amend it. She maybe can, but she will have to dismiss some of the defendants first or change/better specify the causes of the action.
 
  • #2,246
Just like in the recently dismissed (nationally known) GJ cases? There's a reason the statement that GJs indict a ham sandwich grew legs.

MOO
Such as? There have been several cases where a grand jury did not indict.
 
  • #2,247
  • #2,248
Here is Ann Doucette's complaint. She filed it herself.

Complaint for Damages
Not a lot of meat on that bone. JMO

IMO she will have a difficult time proving damages. But she, just like everyone of us, has the right to try through the civil court to do just that.
 
  • #2,249
Lemon and Fort filed a motion to expedite hearing their motion to get the grand jury transcripts.


CONCLUSION

Accordingly, Mr. Lemon and Ms. Fort respectfully move this Court for an order setting an expedited briefing schedule on their pending Joint Motion for Disclosure of Grand Jury Proceedings. Specifically, Mr. Lemon and Ms. Fort request that the Court order the government’s response to the Grand Jury Motion be due within 14 days of the Court deciding this motion, and Mr. Lemon and Ms. Fort’s reply, if any, be due within seven days of the government’s response.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
142
Guests online
2,463
Total visitors
2,605

Forum statistics

Threads
644,281
Messages
18,814,430
Members
245,332
Latest member
LaLaloopy
Top