AZ Nancy Guthrie, 84, (mother of TODAY Show host Savannah Guthrie) missing - last seen in the Catalina foothills area on Jan 31, 2026

  • #6,061
I know it’s an odd question, but I’m curious and like details. I’ll do some research. There was a picture of N somewhere on here and it showed a bandage on her arm which made me wonder.
Could have been a bruise from a blood draw or IV during surgery (I saw the picture, too, but can't remember the placement of the bandage).
 
  • #6,062
Lots of "parts" to the disappearance of NG but not the one thing to pull it together. Extremes are she's either deceased or the entire disappearance is a hoax. Money is somehow involved - maybe. As baffled as everyone, including law enforcement.

I do think if the perp was hired help that they would have taken valuables from the house - unless the person was paid solely to abduct NG for someone else. Maybe a reason posters don't know about? Beginning to think this was not just done by one person. Just think the intruders are gone from the area, state, maybe the country.

She couldn't be abducted w/o a car so why can't LE get a hit on a vehicle? Even a vehicle on an adjacent street at that hour of the morning?
 
  • #6,063
But if someone knew that there wasn't a subscription why would they even bother to take it? Maybe they weren't aware that it didn't save, but still.
It is my understanding- someone correct me if I’m wrong - that the front door camera was not a nest. The front door had a recording/working camera, so was maybe a ring camera?? The cameras placed all around the property (other than front door and MAYBE back door) were nests without subscriptions/no video.

Is that right?
Ring cams recording at front and back doors
—smashed and/or taken

Nest cams everywhere else
(not main entrances)
—no subscription/no video
—not smashed, not taken
 
  • #6,064
It's the crypto that moves into and out of a wallet that is traceable on the ledger (aka the blockchain) so it's the "spending" of crypto in a wallet that makes it traceable, not the existence of a wallet itself. That's true even if one uses a mixer/tumbler.
It sounds like the kidnapper wants millions of dollars worth of crypto, but it might be interesting to see how kidnapper behaves if their wallet was sent for example $20,000 - would the kidnapper leave $20,000 there forever or start moving it which provides clues for investigators. Even if they left the bitcoin untouched in the wallet for years, it's easy to set up an alert to monitor a wallet and if it ever started moving out of the wallet that would provide clues.
I actually wondered if they could provide the requested crypto but lock it....
 
  • #6,065
Someone posted way earlier in the thread that Nancy had had some electrical work done at her house and that the permit had final inspection the first week of January. I guess I’m surprised there hasn’t been more discussion of that, this seems right around the time punch list work would be completed, which can cause tension sometimes. That coupled with the white van would lead me to perhaps look at any disgruntled tradesmen that had been in her home recently.
Yes, that was me. Final inspection was done on the 6th of January. I would have to believe they looked into that. Heck, Columbo would have been on that in a flash!
 
  • #6,066
I think all family and others are suspects. This guy may have been the one to take her home last night. He may be the nicest guy you would ever want to meet. He does make some wild music, though... one album entitled: Life:Love::Love:Murder. The band is Early Black and they play in the Tucson area. Maybe someone with more insight into this music could add to this. Otherwise, it is reported that he taught biology.
There's absolutely nothing "wild" about the band or their music, I took the time to listen to them. Not sure where this is coming from, 50 year old teacher plays bass, it's more like a hobby at this level. I know it's not, like, country music or something, but genre-wise, nowadays, drill-rap could mean we should have a closer look at him ;)
 
  • #6,067
She held something up with large text and a QR code in the middle. This was a few nights ago. Maybe it was a prop. Ashleigh irritates the hell out of me sometimes.
Finally, someone else who is not a fan of Ashleigh! 🤣
 
  • #6,068
i watched Harvey Levin and he understands the stakes here and thankfully is not releasing that info on location of Apple watch. Based on his experience with lots of crazy things he seems to think this is credible.

Democrats. She really hated Trump.
She doesn't have a hateful bone in her body
 
  • #6,069
Yesterday during the press conference, the FBI said they’d be putting up digital billboards for Nancy Guthrie.Can confirm while driving back to Phoenix from Tucson, my photographer & I saw a couple of them once we got into the PHX area right off the I-10 freeway

 
  • #6,070
Could have been a bruise from a blood draw or IV during surgery (I saw the picture, too, but can't remember the placement of the bandage).

I noticed the bruises and assumed that they were the result of taking blood thinners. My Mom took blood thinners and I recall she occasionally had similar bruises as a result.
 
  • #6,071
It is my understanding- someone correct me if I’m wrong - that the front door camera was not a nest. The front door had a recording/working camera, so was maybe a ring camera??
The front door camera was almost surely a Nest. I am 99.9% sure. There is a clear and close-up photo of the front door area showing the locks as well as the (now empty) door camera/doorbell bracket, and it looks exactly like a Nest doorbell mounting bracket, for a battery-powered (not wired) Nest doorbell. I suppose it's possible that some other brand uses an identical bracket, or that they had somehow mounted a different brand on a Nest mounting bracket, but I think it's pretty unlikely. Occam's Razor says that it was a Nest doorbell.
 
  • #6,072
MOO perhaps the bargaining chip is no longer alive.

But MOO I think the ransom is a red herring and distraction.
I agree.
IMO
I think the sole purpose of taking her out of the house was to get rid of any evidence which to me means it was someone already in the database or like a fam. member who LE can compare possible traces of dna with.
Also i think it's someone that has something to lose, someone with a job and a family.
For example, a meth addict wouldn't care or even think about being caught, so getting rid of evidence is not their priority after commiting a crime.
Some thought has gone into taking her from the scene.
JMO.
 
  • #6,073
My opinions only:

What are the chances that Nancy Guthrie is still alive? <20%

What are the chances the one responsible was a healthcare person, gardener, maid, electrician, etc? 40%

What are the chances the one responsible was a family member? 60%

What are the chances the police and FBI will eventually solve this case? 80%

When do I think a person(s) will be arrested? Within the next 10 days.

I am pretty close to your percentages...I would however raise the percentage on electrician, etc and lower on family member.
 
  • #6,074
Does anyone remember early on when the ransom note was reported on, that it was mentioned somewhere about the Thursday/Monday deadlines. But then in the last 24 hours people were responding like it was new information. I could have sworn I'd already heard that somewhere earlier. From what I recall, it was ransom to be sent by Thursday and to be received in their account by Monday. When I heard that I thought well maybe they are allowing time for the transfer - so pay by Thursday and it better be in my account by Monday.

Maybe I'm wrong, there's been so much swirling around
I thought it was originally reported as pay x amount by Thursday or the price goes up and you have until Monday to pay the higher amount or else. Seems like i heard that the day TMZ reported the ransom note but not sure about that
 
  • #6,075
None of this makes sense
no robbery
questionable ransom letter to tmz days later
an elderly target with health issues
not targeted? no mention of savannah specifically
savannah has money, but not enough for this kind of drama
could have gone after that money a much easier way
So what did taking NG actually accomplish?

If the ransom was not the main objective:
1. We know it prevented SG from going to Italy. Covering the Olympics usually means feel-good stories. So, did she have something else on her schedule that might have been destructive to someone's life? The possibility of her discovering a dark secret in TC's background tugs at my mind. However, since he's been in the family for such a long time, surely SG would have already checked him out if she wanted to. Has something come up recently?

2. It also brought the son home from Vermont. How did that change his schedule? We simply don't know.

3. Did it prevent something happening in the life of Annie and TC?

4. Or was it a break-in gone bad and simply scheduled on a bright full-moon night?

What has been accomplished? How could something be big enough to risk prison for kidnapping, possibly murder?
 
  • #6,076
View attachment 642071

I really, really want to know more about this. We have heard that NG had not attended church in person since Covid. Was NG planning on making an exception to attend this particular Sunday? Did the perp think she would keep up her normal routine of watching the service remotely? Or did the perp know ahead of time that she had made special arrangements to attend in person this particular Sunday?

Me too. This is a piece of the story that is still ambiguous. It’s a simple question: was she in the habit of attending church in person, every Sunday? I realize we the public aren’t owed an explanation, but it’s an innocuous bit of information that one would think wouldn’t jeopardize their investigation. IMO. I haven’t seen an official disclosure that gives a definitive answer.

MOO I think this is “smoke” (as in, ‘where there’s smoke there’s fire’), and I don’t know why there was no further information about this pivotal (IMO) point in the narrative. (The other point is who dropped her at home and
when) It’s a small question, but I think the answer is a big piece of the puzzle. And we don’t know it. JMO
 
  • #6,077
I've been leaning on the AB theory, but now leaning on a possible scenario in which this is someone living in Tuscon, who knows TC/AG. Previous criminal background, maybe a drug problem and/or psychopath. (TC's bandmate is reported to have a criminal history).

Given NG's connection to SG the 'abduction' would get the media attention they crave, and with SG's wealth, they might have a chance at actually getting the Bitcoin. A nice older lady with trouble walking, living alone in an isolated neighborhood, would not be hard to subdue for them.

Did the perp know that TC went to drop NG off that night, and therefore, if they did it then, TC would be the last person to see her, and they were alone together, so TC would be suspect not them, throwing LE off.

Either way surely LE is onto not only looking at family but those close to them. Maybe when LS declined the rule out family publicly, it was a red herring, they were trying to make the perp or perps think that family was the suspect instead of the actual suspect they are looking at.

Maybe it did not go as planned, and NG was no longer with us which is why the ransom letter says this will be the only contact. They can't give proof of life, and also more risk getting caught.

Such a disgusting, sad, shocking and unbelievable event. My heart goes out to SGs family and friends. Heartbreaking to watch this go on.
 
  • #6,078
Yeh. It will be interesting to see how this pans out. Either way, i don’t think the motive for taking her was actually for ransom. It almost seems like they know this, so they aren’t taking the ransom seriously?? That’s why i don’t think ransom was the motive. Maybe the note IS real, but was only written to throw LE off the right track.

changing subjects— NOT accusing children AT ALL, but I saw children in a Christmas photo - I think it was Christmas 2025, but maybe I’m wrong. I’m sure y’all have all seen the photo.

Who do they belong to? Again, just curious and am NOT sleuthing the kids. Are they A & T’s kids? Just wondering
I agree. I’m feeling this may have nothing to do with a ransom and that the actual motive is something entirely different than what’s being discussed. Not wanting to elaborate just now.
 
  • #6,079
Lots of "parts" to the disappearance of NG but not the one thing to pull it together. Extremes are she's either deceased or the entire disappearance is a hoax. Money is somehow involved - maybe. As baffled as everyone, including law enforcement.

I do think if the perp was hired help that they would have taken valuables from the house - unless the person was paid solely to abduct NG for someone else. Maybe a reason posters don't know about? Beginning to think this was not just done by one person. Just think the intruders are gone from the area, state, maybe the country.

She couldn't be abducted w/o a car so why can't LE get a hit on a vehicle? Even a vehicle on an adjacent street at that hour of the morning?

With the proliferation of ring cameras and other video systems, I am 100% certain LE has seen a vehicle that is involved.

However, at night it is very difficult to get a detailed view of a license plate of a moving or even stationary. At least LE is going to be able to get the make and model and possibly the color (or light or dark) vehicle.

With that, as they fan out to neighboring area, they might find where the vehicle entered the area... and possible an actual clear picture of the vehicle stopped at a traffic light or something.

In a case like this where YOU KNOW there is a vehicle involved, it takes a very long time to gather all the video to trace the vehicle from where it came from. I fully expect they have done that an maybe have followed that thru governmental websites to see that the car came from Ora Valley for example.
 
  • #6,080
<modsnip: Quoted post was remove>

Are we too harsh on AG and TC? We have no proof that they are involved.

After all, we might be looking at a very different situation.

Two children, both successful, have demanding lives and careers far away.

The third one lives next to the mom (who owned her house since when? Long, long ago). They are not wealthy. But the daily
needs of the mother are met by them.

I guess everyone knows that Nancy's nest camera had no subscription.



The subscription is cheap. So it tells me that Nancy was living frugally as old people do.

So what if AG and TC were good people who didn't bother anyone with their mom's needs? And nothing more than that?

And maybe a mother who is retired and a daughter who is a poet and her hubby who is an elementary school teacher are in a bad spot just because they took it upon themselves to meet all mom's daily needs?

I am not prepared to suspect them unless I have better proof.
bold comments by.

i agree with you that she was probably living frugally (IMO) but part of that is because IMO she is not wealthy like people keep alluding to being a reason for her abduction.

we don't know that they took care of her. the only thing i've seen is she has people come in to help (assuming gardeners, house cleaners, pool person). my sister lived minutes away from my parents (I'm across the country) and she rarely if ever was around to do things for them. when i would ask my mom if sis helped with this or that it was always "she's busy". so i'm not giving a blanket "they took care of all mom's daily needs to them" without verification.

BUT i'm not in the camp that either of them had anything to do with NG's abduction and i feel really bad what this is doing for him/them.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
335
Guests online
3,462
Total visitors
3,797

Forum statistics

Threads
639,954
Messages
18,751,825
Members
244,580
Latest member
jm_research
Back
Top