I disagree. When it comes to expert testimony, the jury has a sworn duty to listen to their conclusions based on their years of training, education and experience. "common sense" is irrelevant. The forensic anthropologist testified that the baby was stillborn and they had no reason NOT to believe her because there was no testimony the baby was born alive. Pathologists are never present during the birth. The "gurgle" comment wasn't made by an expert, it was in the police interrogation.I don't believe all babies let out a loud cry some it takes a few attempts. Babies are not all the same. I believe if BSR baby did not have the airway cleaned out the sound she made could have sounded like a gurgle. I think people need to use their common sense. The only person that truly knows what happened that night is BSR. We have not heard the truth from her just conflicting stories she wants to narrate. Which imo is to please mom and dad.
The Drs on the stand can only speculate by what they read and saw in tapes. They also were not present during the birth.
moo
He said a pathologist from Indiana who testified in Richardson’s defense “did an awesome job.”
“She is one of a hundred people with that level of education in the world,” he said. “She had instant credibility.”
‘It was not a live birth’: Second juror speaks about Brooke Skylar Richardson verdict