Found Deceased OK, Veronica Butler 27 & Jilian Kelley 39, Vehicle Abandoned, Texas County, 30 Mar 2024 #7 *Arrests*

...From what I've learned as a GAL, if abuse is disclosed through a forensic interview, a forensic exam is performed. Why would she want her grandchildren to be potentially subjected to this? Absolutely horrible!
BBM, terrible with acronyms, what is GAL? TA, in general, must be a very convincing woman getting the misfits to do what they did, not to mention convincing a board of fabrications. @Ladyotm, I honestly don't know how far it went. Did they just take TA's word on it? You're right, horrible because I think it was all made up in her own head. She must've had to coach the children at the very least, in case they were asked questions. In essence, to get the children to go along with things, I wonder how much she herself tried to brain wash them or promise them things if they got to stay with her.
 
She stopped at nothing to try to take Veronica's children. She should have been satisfied with a healthy relationship but she wanted them for her own! MOO

I'm trying to understand that if she did speak to the board about supposed abuse of the children, in what capacity would she be doing this where it was ok? and would any statements made "on the record" be part of the board meeting minutes? Could it have been to disclosed potential conflicts of interests (the children being brought to the hospital for exams, etc.).

From what I've learned as a GAL, if abuse is disclosed through a forensic interview, a forensic exam is performed. Why would she want her grandchildren to be potentially subjected to this? Absolutely horrible!
Even though it's a regional hospital it is a really small hospital with 25 beds, no nursery or labor & delivery, etc. In fact on the "meet our doctors" page they list 1 doctor and 3 NPs. Given the relatively small numbers of employees, I don't think TA needed to do anything remotely formal to make sure that her version of the 'facts' were heard by whatever staff members she wanted. I don't think anyone else knowingly did anything wrong, they just accepted what she said and then confirmation bias helped things along.

As for 'conflict of interest', the community seems to be the type where pretty much everyone knows everyone and what would be conflicts of interest elsewhere are just a part of living in a rural community.


(ebm)
 
not the OP but GAL = Guardian Ad Litem. Generally a court appointed advocate for a child or disabled adult.

Thanks. Another thing I knew, and then forgot.
Was there ever a GAL for the children in this case?

 
Thanks. Another thing I knew, and then forgot.
Was there ever a GAL for the children in this case?


While I'm sure the Court appointed a GAL for the children upon the death of VB (as their dad, WR, was in court-ordered treatment on this date), I don't believe they had a prior GAL.

I recall WR was granted emergency custody in December 2022 with VB allowed supervised visitation. We know that sometime after December 2022, TA motioned the Court and was granted Intervenor for the minor children (her grandchildren), and was still serving in this role when she murdered their mother. IMO, this was her objective all along -- to remove the children from both her son and VB.

From my notes, VB was scheduled for a "stepped up" visitation hearing on April 17, 2024 where she was requesting unsupervised weekly visits, an overnight weekend, and the child exchange location changed from Four Corners to Elkhart, KS. Also, Cheryl Brune, the party selected by TA and who supervised all prior visits between VB and her children, was subpoenaed to appear at the April hearing and was expected to give a favorable report about the weekly visits she supervised.

Clearly, TA was losing control! Once VB granted unsupervised visitation, it would only be a matter of time before she'd seek and be granted custody. MOO
 
While I'm sure the Court appointed a GAL for the children upon the death of VB (as their dad, WR, was in court-ordered treatment on this date), I don't believe they had a prior GAL.

I recall WR was granted emergency custody in December 2022 with VB allowed supervised visitation. We know that sometime after December 2022, TA motioned the Court and was granted Intervenor for the minor children (her grandchildren), and was still serving in this role when she murdered their mother. IMO, this was her objective all along -- to remove the children from both her son and VB.

From my notes, VB was scheduled for a "stepped up" visitation hearing on April 17, 2024 where she was requesting unsupervised weekly visits, an overnight weekend, and the child exchange location changed from Four Corners to Elkhart, KS. Also, Cheryl Brune, the party selected by TA and who supervised all prior visits between VB and her children, was subpoenaed to appear at the April hearing and was expected to give a favorable report about the weekly visits she supervised.

Clearly, TA was losing control! Once VB granted unsupervised visitation, it would only be a matter of time before she'd seek and be granted custody. MOO
Are the children presently with their dad? Wonder what they're thinking.
 
APR 14, 2025
Today, each defendant is awaiting court to discuss DNA testing, plea deals, and court dates.

Tad Cullum is scheduled to appear in court on April 16, while the other four defendants are set for court on May 14.

 
APR 4, 2025
Thursday, the District Attorney's Office in Texas County filed a motion asking the court for permission to allow the OSBI to conduct DNA testing on several pieces of evidence, including:
  • Ratchet strap handle
  • Prong end of taser
  • Divets/buttons on taser
  • Bloodstain on sock
  • Stain on grey hat
  • Stain on blue and white hat
  • Bloodstain from left Ariat shoe
  • Claw hammer head and grip
Attorneys for each of the five defendants have 15 days to file a response. A hearing on the motion is scheduled for May 15.
 
APR 16, 2025
15 years ago, in 2010, Judge Parsley was the lawyer for Tifany Adams in a civil case in Cimarron County.

Because of that, Cullum and his attorneys said there is a level of bias and impartiality on Judge Parsley’s part and is asking him to disqualify himself from this case.

Tad Cullum’s attorney filed a motion for Judge Jon Parsley to recuse himself because Parsley represented fellow defendant Tifany Adams in an unrelated case. The attorney claims that raises questions about the judge’s ability to be impartial.

On Wednesday, Parsley denied the motion. He said that the representation of Adams in a marriage dissolution case was wrapped up in 2011, and Cullum was not involved in that case.

Co-defendants Adams and Paul Grice were also supposed to appear in court on Wednesday, but their dates were pushed back.
 
APR 16, 2025
Cullum argued rescusals are not limited to situations were a judge harbors "actual bias or hostility towards a party. The appearance of impropriety, a lack of impartiality, or bias is sufficient."

He claimed the judge not stepping down violates his 14th Amendment right to a fair and impartial trial.

In his ruling, Parsley said he reviewed all of the cases cited in the motion, the entire Code of Judicial Conduct, Rule 15 of the Rules for District Court Judges, all the opinions by the Judicial Ethics Advisory Panel, and reviewed additional statutes, court rules, and cases on disqualification and recusal.

He also cited a Oklahoma Supreme Court cases, Pierce vs Pierce, which says a judge is presumed not biased, and a party must "point to some fact to overcome the presumption."

Cullum and his attorneys have the option to appeal this decision. He and the other four defendants are scheduled to appear in court on May 14 to discuss the consumptive testing of evidence related to the murders of Veronica Butler and Jilian Kelley.
 
Judge probably should recluse himself. Just giving them reason for appeal if found guilty.
That's what I was thinking. I don't necessarily believe the judge would be biased, but I just don't want to give the defense a good reason to appeal.

Personally I'd be okay with jailhouse justice eliminating the need for a trial altogether, but I certainly would like to avoid the possibility of a an appeal or retrial.
 
That's what I was thinking. I don't necessarily believe the judge would be biased, but I just don't want to give the defense a good reason to appeal.

Personally I'd be okay with jailhouse justice eliminating the need for a trial altogether, but I certainly would like to avoid the possibility of a an appeal or retrial.
Wonder if this motion is simply TC's attorney planting all the seeds he can for appeals down the road? The evidence appears irrefutable. Maybe it's simply planning for any possible weapon TC can use from death row?
 
Wonder if this motion is simply TC's attorney planting all the seeds he can for appeals down the road? The evidence appears irrefutable. Maybe it's simply planning for any possible weapon TC can use from death row?
That's my guess. They really have nothing to lose by filing it.

If they win the motion, it delays things and maybe they get a new judge they think would be more favorable, or even a change of venue if other judges have similar 'conflicts'. If they lose the motion they definitely have another reason to appeal.
 
Yesterday (4/21/25) TC's lawyers did indeed appeal this to the administrative judge


They do not bring up a change of venue per se, but they do request a judge from out of the immediate area, which I guess for a non-jury trial it's essentially the same thing.

And they bring up the recent motion regarding DNA testing. Not sure what could happen there if they are successful with the motion to have Judge Parsley removed.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
104
Guests online
631
Total visitors
735

Forum statistics

Threads
625,467
Messages
18,504,361
Members
240,808
Latest member
zoeep
Back
Top