Right, but I still have doubts. Just my own weird hinky meter and probably wrong. I just think this murderer would have wanted to engage in conversation about it too much.
IMO
I've been a long time BK-is-not-Pappa-Rodgers advocate not only because Reddit has the best account fingerprinting (duplicate account detection) tools on planet earth using a combination of methods that not even a VPN can avoid to prevent ban avoidance, IMO and MOO .
But also because the majority of things he said were incorrect. If you go through each of the 52 posts that people highlighted post BK's arrest as evidence that BK is Pappa Rodgers, only 18 were direct claims or seemingly rhetorical questions about the crime. The rest were just plain old creepy questions.
Out of those 18 claims about the crime:
- He was correct 22% of the time.
- He was only correct 16% of the time if you don't give him credit for his 11/30 post about the knife and sheath (something the media reported on 11/16 and people were speculating about a sheath even earlier).
- Most of the stuff was posting are inane things like "4 weeks in and no suspects. What is the motive?" or "What do we think is the height and weight of the killer?" things everyone was asking.
What was he right about?
11/30 - when commenting on a pictture of detctives combing the back of the house.... he said something akin to - the killer came from the back of the house and was covered in blood, there's likely evidence there. - Something hundreds of people were already speculating and of course they would be covered in blood.
11/30 - the knife sheat (see above)
12/5 - Other people in the house were alerted by the killers presence. This one is super duper weak. Since there were already rumors about a surviving victim hearing the entire thing and you'd imagine that a brutal crime like this wouldn't be silent.
12/20 - Speculated that the killer struggled with female relations on . Something people had long been speculating.
12/22 - The killer not being in the victims immediate circle on . A time where the inner circle had already volunteered their DNA and LE had loudly cleared a lot of people in their inner circle who were being harassed.
That's literally it. Things that many true crime sleuther were also speculating. But again, MOO.
What was he wrong about?
- wildly wrong about the local of Xana's body
- wildly wrong about the killer entering from an unlocked window
- wildly wrong about Ethan - mirroring the early rumors of him being in the hallway
- white car is a red herring
- white car isn't relevant (a great example of when he's right, which isn't often, he's credited, but when he's wrong...its him trying to throw off LE)
- said the killer was a construction worker or a short term visitor
The last one strikes me as a person who's watched too many episodes of the Forensic Files (no offense, to the real pappa rodger)
There are many many more incorrect claims that would likely bring that percentage even further down. But my memory is hazy and my research isn't accessible right now. Again, all MOO.
Pappa Rodgers is a what happens when the same mechanisms that power astrology are injected to the telephone game. The legend has far outgrown the actual online persona.
MOO
). He committed the act that night because he had to. Kaylee was back in town for essentially the last long weekend before graduation, which he would have known by following her SM accounts.
www.kivitv.com
