What ever happened to putting a person behind a screen , disguising their voice and let 'er 'rip! that's what they did years ago and it worked.. nothing hard about it. Is AZ. supposed to pay to bring this person from NZ.?.. I would call their bluff and say no! Use it for a mistrial? if the law has any sense, they'd LOL at that.As someone said this has no actual bearing on the case. Jodi is behind this. Nurmi is not that stupid! IMO..
So you think TAs "friend" from before he met JA is the NZ crazy person?? Is that right? Wouldnt that be easy for JM to dismantle quickly? Just seems so silly
:seeya: But do Mods count . . . :dunno: ?
:couch: . :truce: . :couch:
Woo Hoo!!! Number 2!!! WOWZA!!
I would bet the real reason they're refusing to testify is because JA told them to, not because they're afraid of anything. And an 11th hour witness about TA's pedophilia? I'm sure Juan will have plenty for him to be afraid of.
Well, I know why the defense doesn't want that friend who knew Travis testifying in the open: because it's a complete crock, they are putting him on at Jodi's direction, and he will be completely dismantled on cross, leaving the defense even more embarrassed than it already is.
I hope Juan can tell the judge about the interview Darryl Brewer gave in full view of the world just after "refusing" to testify in the last mitigation phase due to threats. He's already out there, his face and identity are known. And he's still alive. So what will testifying in secret change now?
Welllllll :thinking: no. But if we didn't do it you all would be on page #2,295,865, and that's just in this thread.
Motion on this page
http://www.courtchatter.com/2014/12/jodi-arias-another-motion-filed-by.html?spref=tw&m=1
Boy it's going to get uglier
----------------------So you think TAs "friend" from before he met JA is the NZ crazy person?? Is that right? Wouldnt that be easy for JM to dismantle quickly? Just seems so silly
eta: Gus searcy is who youre referring to, right?
I almost wish JSS would say "OK done. LWOP. Buh bye. Don't let the door hit ya' where the Good Lord split ya'.
I could be wrong but I thought Dr. F said she didn't think TA was a pedo??
Why would they continue down that road if their own witness testified that he wasn't a pedo?
I could be wrong but I thought Dr. F said she didn't think TA was a pedo??
Why would they continue down that road if their own witness testified that he wasn't a pedo?
Not me. TA's family and JM have put up with too much during the trial and retrial to be bullied or coerced by an unethical DT, a sociopathic killer and a wobbly judge.
Fight on. The end is near.