Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 12/01/14 In recess

Status
Not open for further replies.
This will never fly in a higher court, because if it does then all future DP cases will be closed trials shut off from the public.
 
What ever happened to putting a person behind a screen , disguising their voice and let 'er 'rip! that's what they did years ago and it worked.. nothing hard about it. Is AZ. supposed to pay to bring this person from NZ.?.. I would call their bluff and say no! Use it for a mistrial? if the law has any sense, they'd LOL at that.As someone said this has no actual bearing on the case. Jodi is behind this. Nurmi is not that stupid! IMO..

So you think TAs "friend" from before he met JA is the NZ crazy person?? Is that right? Wouldnt that be easy for JM to dismantle quickly? Just seems so silly

eta: Gus searcy is who youre referring to, right?
 
So you think TAs "friend" from before he met JA is the NZ crazy person?? Is that right? Wouldnt that be easy for JM to dismantle quickly? Just seems so silly

Who is NZ crazy person I lost.

Thank you
 
Hi APT. I feel the same way. They (Law) need to go for broke and stop all this nonsense. The time has come. JUST SAY NO!!~ we are all fed up. She is having fun using the governments money for zilch !! Nurmi (if he can) needs to put his foot down on her hard! She butchered a man, nothing gave her the right to do that. I cant stand her , I'd like to rip her a new one myself!

-------------------------
WELCOME TO WEBSLEUTHS!!
-------------------------- :welcome6: :greetings: :wagon:
 
I would bet the real reason they're refusing to testify is because JA told them to, not because they're afraid of anything. And an 11th hour witness about TA's pedophilia? I'm sure Juan will have plenty for him to be afraid of.

I wish JSS would look Nurmi dead in the eye and say "I have one word for you - 'Subpoena'. And as far as the defendant goes, this is still the same 'trial' and she's waived her right to silence."
 
Well, I know why the defense doesn't want that friend who knew Travis testifying in the open: because it's a complete crock, they are putting him on at Jodi's direction, and he will be completely dismantled on cross, leaving the defense even more embarrassed than it already is.

I hope Juan can tell the judge about the interview Darryl Brewer gave in full view of the world just after "refusing" to testify in the last mitigation phase due to threats. He's already out there, his face and identity are known. And he's still alive. So what will testifying in secret change now?

If it is the fiend Marc McGee he is posting on social media. If he can do that he should be able to testify in open court.
 
Anxious to read Mr M response to this garbage
 
I almost wish JSS would say "OK done. LWOP. Buh bye. Don't let the door hit ya' where the Good Lord split ya'.
 
So you think TAs "friend" from before he met JA is the NZ crazy person?? Is that right? Wouldnt that be easy for JM to dismantle quickly? Just seems so silly

eta: Gus searcy is who youre referring to, right?
----------------------
No. We were speaking of D.Brewer at the time. This subject doesn't deserve another time consuming hearing, that is what happens. More trial time wasted on what will be a no anyway..They are just playing for time..a couple more days away from Perryville. I have no doubt Juan would make mush of him. P.S. I do not think the person is crazy. IMO..:seeya:
 
Well, Nurmi's super secret defense witness list is just a little bit exposed now.

Requesting that the Constitution be violated for the likes of Brewer or the pathological fellow from NZ to testify.....what a joke. Unfunny, but too ridiculous to take seriously.
 
I almost wish JSS would say "OK done. LWOP. Buh bye. Don't let the door hit ya' where the Good Lord split ya'.

Not me. TA's family and JM have put up with too much during the trial and retrial to be bullied or coerced by an unethical DT, a sociopathic killer and a wobbly judge.

Fight on. The end is near.
 
I could be wrong but I thought Dr. F said she didn't think TA was a pedo??

Why would they continue down that road if their own witness testified that he wasn't a pedo?
 
I could be wrong but I thought Dr. F said she didn't think TA was a pedo??

Why would they continue down that road if their own witness testified that he wasn't a pedo?

Most excellent point, grasshopper.
 
I could be wrong but I thought Dr. F said she didn't think TA was a pedo??

Why would they continue down that road if their own witness testified that he wasn't a pedo?

To support JA's story that her whole relationship with TA went downhill that fateful day when she spotted his computer screen or piece of paper with a naked kid on it when she popped by unexpectedly on a day that she never even went to his house.
 
Not me. TA's family and JM have put up with too much during the trial and retrial to be bullied or coerced by an unethical DT, a sociopathic killer and a wobbly judge.

Fight on. The end is near.

I did say almost, but on a more serious note, I can't help but feel that a DP conviction in the current political climate is a less secure sentence than LWOP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
207
Guests online
891
Total visitors
1,098

Forum statistics

Threads
625,967
Messages
18,517,223
Members
240,914
Latest member
CalvinJ
Back
Top