An article from 2007 however the subject of brain immaturity and youth crime has been in the news recently regarding youth sentencing.
May I state categorically, that I do not think that AC should have been dealt with any more leniently than he has been and I recognise that there's a huge difference in petty crime and what AC carried out however the same factors are possibly in play.
I found this interesting from one of the perplexities that all of us have had since day one, that is, what went through the mind of a sixteen - year old schoolboy to commit his first and most horrific of crimes.
It was opportunistic and inhuman.
Developmental immaturity is recognised as a factor in many youth crimes. One of it's definitions is a lack of cognitive, behavioral, emotional, and social development in the transitional period of adolescence.
AC appeared to have displayed a complete lack of maturity or understanding in what he had done.
The actions of saying to his friends "here's the killer" or lying at court and blaming someone else are signs of many things including that of a child much younger than sixteen years old.
I wonder if he was/is lacking in mental maturity and if his background plays a much bigger part in understanding what went through his mind?
I may have asked the question but I don't want us to get 'shut-down' again for speculation or jumping to the wrong conclusions with any answers!
Experts link teen brains' immaturity, juvenile crime
"By around 15 or 16, the parts of the brain that arouse a teen emotionally and make him pay attention to peer pressure and the rewards of action — the gas pedal — are probably all set. But the parts related to controlling impulses, long-term thinking, resistance to peer pressure and planning — the brake, mostly in the frontal lobes — are still developing."